Election Policy Brief | Supporting Regional Recovery and Resilience | Asia Society Skip to main content

Unsupported Browser Detected.
It seems the web browser you're using doesn't support some of the features of this site. For the best experience, we recommend using a modern browser that supports the features of this website. We recommend Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox, or Microsoft Edge

  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Past Events
    • Global Live Webcasts
    • Program Streams
  • Issues
    • Complex Asia
    • Trade Smarter
    • Living with China
    • Generation Asia
  • Analysis
    • Australian Election Policy Briefs 2022
    • Briefing MONTHLY
    • China Executive Briefing
    • Disruptive Asia
    • Southeast Asia and COVID-19 Project
    • Webcast Videos
    • Explainers
    • Looking Ahead
  • Initiatives
    • Asia Trade and Innovation Hub
    • Supply Chains in Southeast Asia
    • Generation Asia Research Reports
    • Asia Taskforce
    • CEO Roundtables
    • Viet Nam Initiative
    • Australia and Korea: Middle Power Parallels
    • Australia-Japan: Stepping up a Special Strategic Relationship in Asia
  • Experts
    • Asia Society Policy Institute in Australia
    • Distinguished Fellowships
    • Scholar-In-Residence
    • Media Enquiries
  • News
  • Members and Partners
    • Become a Member
    • Our Members
    • Our Partners
  • Support Us
    • Support Asia Society Australia
    • Donate now
    • Planned giving
  • About
    • About Asia Society Australia
    • Our Strategic Plan
    • Our Programs
    • Our People
    • Our Board and Advisory Council
    • For the Media
    • Careers and Internships
    • Contact Us
Australia
Search
Australia
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Past Events
    • Global Live Webcasts
    • Program Streams
  • Issues
    • Complex Asia
    • Trade Smarter
    • Living with China
    • Generation Asia
  • Analysis
    • Australian Election Policy Briefs 2022
    • Briefing MONTHLY
    • China Executive Briefing
    • Disruptive Asia
    • Southeast Asia and COVID-19 Project
    • Webcast Videos
    • Explainers
    • Looking Ahead
  • Initiatives
    • Asia Trade and Innovation Hub
    • Supply Chains in Southeast Asia
    • Generation Asia Research Reports
    • Asia Taskforce
    • CEO Roundtables
    • Viet Nam Initiative
    • Australia and Korea: Middle Power Parallels
    • Australia-Japan: Stepping up a Special Strategic Relationship in Asia
  • Experts
    • Asia Society Policy Institute in Australia
    • Distinguished Fellowships
    • Scholar-In-Residence
    • Media Enquiries
  • News
  • Members and Partners
    • Become a Member
    • Our Members
    • Our Partners
  • Support Us
    • Support Asia Society Australia
    • Donate now
    • Planned giving
  • About
    • About Asia Society Australia
    • Our Strategic Plan
    • Our Programs
    • Our People
    • Our Board and Advisory Council
    • For the Media
    • Careers and Internships
    • Contact Us

Election Policy Brief | Supporting Regional Recovery and Resilience

by Bridi Rice, CEO, Development Intelligence Lab

Rice - Solomon Islands aid - DFAT - Flickr
Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade - Flickr
April 18th, 2022

What is the issue?

The COVID-19 pandemic sent almost 100 million people globally into extreme poverty in 2020 alone. Eighty million are in the Indo-Pacific. At the same time, rates of inequality are increasing, particularly in middle-income countries across the Indo-Pacific. At first, the Pacific remained protected as its economies and livelihoods absorbed the blow of border closures. But that time has run out. For many low- and middle-income countries, the pandemic is just getting started. For Southeast Asia, despite relatively robust signs of early economic recovery, significant middle-income traps loom. And for the poorest countries, poverty rates are likely to worsen. Post-election, an incoming government will be greeted by a development portfolio experiencing a resurgence of relevance with like-minded partners. But it’s also a portfolio poised for a much needed refresh. As regional challenges operate at the intersection of security, the environment, economics and technology, classic development challenges of health, poverty, equality and education continue.

Where do the major parties stand?

The current Government’s leadership on development is most visible through two prisms: increased political engagement with the Pacific led by the Prime Minister, and a welcomed refocus on Southeast Asia over the past two years. The Government argues that its pandemic response has been swift, generous and successful. It launched a COVID-19-specific ‘Partnerships for Recovery’ development policy under which vaccines, health teams, direct budget support and PPE were deployed into the region alongside existing development projects. The policy unlocked temporary increases of the official development budget and other complementary measures such as loans and infrastructure support for both the Pacific and Southeast Asia.[1]

Critics of the government focus on its official development assistance expenditure, arguing that the budget increases started from an already inadequate development budget base and were not commensurate to the scale of the challenge facing the region. They argue that even when accounting for additional “temporary” COVID-19 official development assistance, Australia’s current development budget is only 0.2% of GNI, amongst the least generous of all OECD donors' expenditure. The March budget revealed that this would only decrease in coming years.

Labor has committed to “rebuild Australia’s international development program” and increase assistance to internationally-accepted levels of at least 0.5% of GNI, starting from its first budget. Labor will use the globally recognised Sustainable Development Goals as a blueprint for development, focusing on accountability, transparency, and program effectiveness.

The platform is widely regarded as a positive step towards enhancing development effectiveness for Australia. The budget commitment will see a steadily growing development program. But critics who advocate for a more focused development program are cautious of the broad goals set out, and sober about how the budget will be rebuilt given fiscal pressures and the challenge of shifting development practice in the immediate term.

Policy recommendations

Geopolitical competition is turbo-charging the relevance of development programs in the Pacific and Southeast Asia. France, the US, the UK and China are all increasing their development footprints. Australia’s development program is the most visible indicator of Australia’s appetite to support regional recovery and resilience.  

The adequacy of Australian support to the region’s recovery and resilience ought be measured against: the scale of health, social and economic crises and its severe impacts on the region if human development indicators spiral downwards; the implications for Australia and Australians of those impacts; and whether our developmental architecture, policy and delivery capability can be relied upon for the next wave of challenges.

On these measures, neither party has shown a strong indication of long-term analysis or planning. An incoming government faces a strategic choice on development: Will government increase the priority of long term regional resilience through its development program? Or will the program snap back to pre-pandemic routines? The answer will likely come down to how each party judges the development, diplomatic and security rewards derived from development investments.

[1] The Government conceives of its development footprint as a combination of (1) baseline official development assistance that hovers just above $4b, (2) temporary additional assistance for COVID-19 of approx. $460m in 2022-23, and (3) a range of complementary measures which contribute to regional development but which are not administered or accounted for in internationally agreed development financing terms (for example, cable support to Timor Leste and Palau, defence cooperation and loans made outside of the official development program).  Whether analysts include this third category of expenditure in development program calculations drastically alters the perceived size and scale of Australian support, but most have been hesitant to do so given this is not the international norm.


Bridi Rice is Founder & CEO of the Development Intelligence Lab and Visitor at RegNet, Australian National University's College of Asia and the Pacific.

Australian Election Policy Briefs 2022

  • Election Policy Briefs collage

    Australian Election Policy Briefs 2022

    Our experts examine the big election issues for Australia in 2022, outline where the major parties stand, and offer policy recommendations.

More Election Policy Briefs

  • Ivanov - Hong Kong - Igor Son - Unsplash
    series

    Election Policy Brief | Australia’s Future in a Shared Region

    Asia Society Australia’s view on the foreign policy outlook ahead of the 2022 Australian election.
  • Suckling - Solar gift - Kate Ausburn - Flickr
    series

    Election Policy Brief | Climate Change and Clean Energy

    Are the major parties' climate policy proposals enough to arrest man-made climate change, and what should they be doing?
  • Boekenstein - US Marines in Darwin - US Department of Defence - Flickr
    series

    Election Policy Brief | Defending Australia

    What are the major parties planning for Defence in this election, and what are the best policy strategies for national security?
  • Fraser - Myanmar police - R Bociaga - Shutterstock
    series

    Election Policy Brief | Human Rights

    What are the major parties promising to do to support human rights across the region, and what must they do?
  • Byrne - ASEAN Day festivities - Miraclebuggy - AdobeStock
    series

    Election Policy Brief | Engaging Southeast Asia

    How are the major parties looking to engage with Southeast Asia?

Pagination

  • Current page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Next page Next
  • Last page Last
About
  • Mission & History
  • Our People
  • Become a Member
  • Career Opportunities
  • Corporate Involvement
visit us
  • Hong Kong
  • New York
  • Texas
global network
  • Australia
  • France
  • India
  • Japan
  • Korea
  • Northern California
  • Philippines
  • Southern California
  • Switzerland
  • Washington, D.C.
resources
  • Arts
  • Asia Society Magazine
  • ChinaFile
  • Current Affairs
  • Education
  • For Kids
  • Policy
  • Video
shop
  • AsiaStore
initiatives
  • Arts & Museum Summit
  • Asia 21 Young Leaders
  • Asia Arts Game Changer Awards
  • Asia Game Changer Awards
  • Asia Society Museum: The Asia Arts & Museum Network
  • Asia Society Policy Institute
  • Asian Women Empowered
  • Center on U.S.-China Relations
  • Coal + Ice
  • Creative Voices of Muslim Asia
  • Global Cities Education Network
  • Global Talent Initiatives
  • U.S.-Asia Entertainment Summit
  • U.S.-China Dialogue
  • U.S.-China Museum Summit
Connect
Email Signup For the media
Asia Society logo
©2023 Asia Society | Privacy Statement | Accessibility | Terms & Conditions | Sitemap | Contact

Asia Society takes no institutional position on policy issues and has no affiliation with any government.
The views expressed by Asia Society staff, fellows, experts, report authors, program speakers, board members, and other affiliates are solely their own. Learn more.

 

 

  • Visit Us
  • Hong Kong
  • New York
  • Texas
  • Global Network
  • Australia
  • France
  • India
  • Japan
  • Korea
  • Northern California
  • Philippines
  • Southern California
  • Switzerland
  • Washington, DC