Japan: Recent Trends In Education Reform | Asia Society Skip to main content

Unsupported Browser Detected.
It seems the web browser you're using doesn't support some of the features of this site. For the best experience, we recommend using a modern browser that supports the features of this website. We recommend Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox, or Microsoft Edge

  • Professional Development
    • Global Ed Explorer
    • Online Courses
  • Educator Resources
    • Teaching for Global Understanding
  • About the Network
    • Meeting History & Agendas
    • Approach and Impact
    • Reports
  • About the Center for Global Education
    • Who We Are
    • Where We Work
    • Results and Opportunities
    • News and Events
Search
Global Cities Education Network
  • Professional Development
    • Global Ed Explorer
    • Online Courses
  • Educator Resources
    • Teaching for Global Understanding
  • About the Network
    • Meeting History & Agendas
    • Approach and Impact
    • Reports
  • About the Center for Global Education
    • Who We Are
    • Where We Work
    • Results and Opportunities
    • News and Events

Japan: Recent Trends In Education Reform

chalk (ajari/flickr)

by Dr. Robert Fish

Two trends have dominated domestic debate regarding Japanese education since the 1990s. The trends can be symbolized as a perceived conflict between the catch phrase “yutori kyōiku,” roughly (and somewhat misleadingly) translated as a more relaxed education or education some freedom, and the “Action Plan for Improving Academic Ability,” a specific response to the perceived decline of the academic (meaning ability in math, science, and literacy) in comparison to their peers in other industrialized nations. Japan will implement a new comprehensive guide to elementary education in April 2011, representing an attempt to maintain some of the benefits of the educational reforms of the 1990s and early 2000s while increasing the academic rigor of Japanese compulsory education.

As in many democratic nations, the simplified debate between “yutori kyōiku” and “improving academic ability” masks a much more complex reality. To make sense of the debates over educational reform in the past two decades requires understanding of the basic structure of primary education in Japan and the relationship between policy and practice in Japanese schools.

The basic outline of Japanese public school education is outlined in a series of documents created by the Ministry of Education, Sports, Culture and Technology (MEXT). Most importantly is the Gakushū Shidō Yōryō, essentially a Handbook for Education that provides specific guidance to Japanese schools. The document determines such important topics as the subjects to be taught and the minimum number of hours to be spent on each subject at each grade level. In the late 1980s and 1990s, a number of leaders in different sectors of Japan expressed concern that Japanese schools produced graduates that had strong basic academic skills but lacked creativity, independence, and the desire to be lifelong learners. There was also widely held concern, especially amongst educators, that schooling was too intense, creating excessive stress on students. The Gakushū Shidō Yōryō that was implemented in 2002, responding to these trends, implemented the strongest version of “yutori kyōiku.” The ultimate desire was to instill in students “a zest for learning.”

MEXT implemented a number of reforms for compulsory education (through the completion of the third year of Junior High School, roughly 9th grade in the U.S. system). The three that have garnered the most attention are the reduction in the number of school hours, reduction of the number of hours devoted to academic subjects, and the creation of a course of “integrated studies.” The reduction in school hours was accomplished primarily through eliminating Saturday classes, a reform that had been gradually being implemented since the 1990s. The course in integrated studies was intended to allow schools the freedom to create a learning space outside the traditional bounds of the curriculum that would not be closely associated with entrance tests or tightly defined learning outcomes. With this freedom, the courses were to allow for greater choice, individualizing the courses to meet the individual goals of students in the upper grades, and allow for easier teaching about topics that worked across the curriculum, such as studying the natural environment, education for a global world, or studying “information technology.”

Shortly after the implementation of the new curriculum, Japanese students declined in their achievement on international comparative tests, especially the TIMMS and PISA studies. In response, a number of gradual changes were implemented designed to help improve the academic performance of Japanese students while maintaining some of the benefits of the earlier reforms. Key changes included a gradual increase in the required topics to be taught in the standard academic subjects, a gradual increase in the number of hours devoted to these subjects, and the implementation of national standardized testing at the end of the 6th and 9th grades (National Survey on Educational Performance) in mathematics and Japanese for the first time starting in 2007. The tests were implemented with a desire to assess the skills of the students as a whole and target areas where there were needs for improvement in the system. The tests were met with significant concern that they would be used as a means of creating greater comparison and competition between schools as well as increase pressure on students. The tests, which included extensive student and teacher surveys, provide a rich source of data regarding not just the strengths and weaknesses of Japanese students, but also rich data regarding other factors that can effect learning as diverse as the amount of time spent reading independently each day, student breakfast habits, and student use of cell phones to send e-mails each day. (Both test questions and summaries of results for each year can be accessed online (in Japanese) at: http://www.nier.go.jp/kaihatsu/zenkokugakuryoku.html).

Based on the previous decade of experience with “yutori kyōiku” and significant data has been collected, especially since the implementation of standardized testing in 2007, the Gakushū Shidō Yōryō to be implemented in April 2011 represents a significant modification of the 2002 reforms. The decrease in school hours will be maintained, as will the integrated studies courses, but less emphasis than in the past decade. The topics to be covered in math and Japanese, which have been gradually increasing since 2004, will increase significantly as will the number of hours devoted to these subjects. As can be seen in the charts below, the number of overall teaching periods has increased, as well as the number of hours devoted to math and Japanese. (Each teaching period is 45 minutes. The number represents the required number of teaching periods per academic year, which runs from April – March.)

Comparison of School Periods in Japan, 2002 and 2012

The changes outlined in this summary represent substantive changes in the structure of a Japanese students’ school day – with obvious effects on learning. Teaching methods in Japan have also changed in recent years, but the changes have tended to be more gradual. While it goes beyond the scope of this summary to describe them in detail, three dominant trends have been to increasingly emphasize literacy across the curriculum, place greater emphasis on quantitative reasoning skills and the ability to understand the concepts behind the numbers in mathematics, and integrating more “experiential learning” across the curriculum. That being said, changes in teaching methods have tended to be gradual, and, as a general idea, emphasize gradually attempting and integrating new teaching techniques into more traditional teaching methods. Particularly in the math curriculum, a balance has been maintained between teaching concepts while maintaining strengths in teaching basic numeracy skills. The combination has resulted, for example, in Japanese students by the second grade solving far more complex mathematical problems in terms of both basic numerical skills and in terms of quantitative reasoning than the majority of their peers in the United States. Many of the changes and debates outlined in this summary and changes being implemented in 2012 are the direct outgrowth of the results of previous TIMMS and PISA reports, so the results of the current most recent PISA report are likely to impact future education reform in Japan.

Dr. Robert Fish is Director of Education at Japan Society of New York, where he edits an extensive online resource for teachers, About Japan: A Teachers Resource. Dr. Fish holds a doctorate in Japanese history, with a specialty in the history of Japanese education.

Explore School Systems Around the World

  • Students in class in Vietnam (Vanessa Shadoian-Gersing)

    Education in Vietnam

    Vietnamese students surprised the world with their 2012 PISA results. Vanessa Shadoian-Gersing, a former OECD analyst who writes and consults on global education, offers observations based on her recent work in Vietnam.
  • case study word cloud
    article

    Case Study: Catholic Regional College Sydenham

    Students are able to choose from an extensive range of vocational education and training (VET) certificates offered either at the College or at an external training provider as part of their senior secondary studies.
  • case study word cloud
    article

    Case Study: Northern College of the Arts and Technology

    The College has a reputation for quality curriculum design and engaging vocational education and training (VET) programs across the arts, trades, and technologies.
  • Best educational practices are not-so-secret. (Tomwang112/iStockPhoto)

    Learning from the "Shanghai Secret"

    Shanghai's “Four Traditionals” and “Eight Moderns” which the U.S. education system could adapt.
  • The race for excellence and equity in education. (abdulrahman.stock/iStockPhoto)
    report
     /  Education

    Transforming Learning in Cities

    Advice on how to offer an excellent education to every student.
  • It keeps Singapore economically strong. (TommL/iStockPhoto)
    article

    Singapore: Innovation in Technical Education

    Different sectors in Singapore gather to study workforce demands of the future, and plan how to create a supply of highly qualified workers.
  • Classroom supplies (Liz (perspicacious.org/flickr)

    Top School Systems Announced

    Asia dominates the top of the list; the United States, stagnant.
  • Students work on computers

    Asia: New Top of the Class

    A worldwide new education survey ranks US students well behind many of their Asian counterparts. Can America still catch up?
  • People in Hong Kong (caspermoller/flickr)

    Hong Kong: Reform that Works

    An international port city reformed its education to meet the new opportunities of a knowledge economy.
  • Students in Shanghai (plastic spatula/flickr)

    Shanghai: The World's Best School System

    What they do right, and what the rest of the world can learn.

Related Content

  • article

    How Being Part of a Global Network Transformed Denver Schools

    Denver Public Schools Superintendent Tom Boasberg shares some of the lessons Denver has learned through Asia Society's Global Cities Education Network from school systems around the world.
  • Preparing Students for the 21st Century

    The American cities of New York, Denver, and Seattle, as well as the Asian cities of Singapore, Hiroshima, Shanghai, and Seoul, share their strategies and challenges in integrating 21st-century competencies into their school systems.
  • report

    A Rosetta Stone for Social and Emotional Skills

    Learn more about how research suggests that social and emotional factors could and should play a more pivotal role in educational policy and practice.
  • report

    Improving Performance of Low-Achieving and Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Students

    How to improve diverse students' achievement: lessons from five school systems.
  • Asia: New Top of the Class

    A worldwide new education survey ranks US students well behind many of their Asian counterparts. Can America still catch up?

Videos

  • Education
     /  India

    Starting Early: Education To Nurture World Peace

    A discussion about the concept of Global Citizenship Education (GCED), its implementation, and its various advantages for education systems around the world.
    Watch Now
  • Business

    Innovation Conference: Education for Innovation and Entrepreneurship

    Karen Cator, Robin Goldberg, Leslie Hook, Anthony Jackson, and Caroline Winnett discuss whether education reform in China is needed for the country to realize its innovative potential.
    Watch Now
  • Education

    Giselle Martin-Kniep: Sustaining School Improvement

    The President of Learner-Centered Initiatives calls for a broad re-evaluation of the way American schools work.
    Watch Now
  • Education

    Arne Duncan: Education Is the New Currency

    U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan, Asia Society's Tony Jackson and other officials introduce the interactive project "Mapping the Nation."
    Watch Now
  • Education

    Mapping the Nation (Complete)

    U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan, Asia Society's Tony Jackson and other officials introduce the interactive project "Mapping the Nation."
    Watch Now
About
  • Mission & History
  • Our People
  • Become a Member
  • Career Opportunities
  • Corporate Involvement
visit us
  • Hong Kong
  • New York
  • Texas
global network
  • Australia
  • France
  • India
  • Japan
  • Korea
  • Northern California
  • Philippines
  • Southern California
  • Switzerland
  • Washington, D.C.
resources
  • Arts
  • Asia Society Magazine
  • ChinaFile
  • Current Affairs
  • Education
  • For Kids
  • Policy
  • Video
shop
  • AsiaStore
initiatives
  • Arts & Museum Summit
  • Asia 21 Young Leaders
  • Asia Arts Game Changer Awards
  • Asia Game Changer Awards
  • Asia Society Museum: The Asia Arts & Museum Network
  • Asia Society Policy Institute
  • Asian Women Empowered
  • Center on U.S.-China Relations
  • Coal + Ice
  • Creative Voices of Muslim Asia
  • Global Cities Education Network
  • Global Talent Initiatives
  • U.S.-Asia Entertainment Summit
  • U.S.-China Dialogue
  • U.S.-China Museum Summit
Connect
Email Signup For the media
Asia Society logo
©2023 Asia Society | Privacy Statement | Accessibility | Terms & Conditions | Sitemap | Contact

Asia Society takes no institutional position on policy issues and has no affiliation with any government.
The views expressed by Asia Society staff, fellows, experts, report authors, program speakers, board members, and other affiliates are solely their own. Learn more.

 

 

  • Visit Us
  • Hong Kong
  • New York
  • Texas
  • Global Network
  • Australia
  • France
  • India
  • Japan
  • Korea
  • Northern California
  • Philippines
  • Southern California
  • Switzerland
  • Washington, DC