How Australia can Help Keep Taiwan Safe | Asia Society Skip to main content

Unsupported Browser Detected.
It seems the web browser you're using doesn't support some of the features of this site. For the best experience, we recommend using a modern browser that supports the features of this website. We recommend Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox, or Microsoft Edge

  • Back to asiasociety.org
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Past Events
    • Global Live Webcasts
    • Program Streams
  • Issues
    • Complex Asia
    • Trade Smarter
    • Living with China
    • Generation Asia
  • Analysis
    • Australian Election Policy Briefs 2022
    • Briefing MONTHLY
    • China Executive Briefing
    • Disruptive Asia
    • Southeast Asia and COVID-19 Project
    • Webcast Videos
    • Explainers
    • Looking Ahead
  • Initiatives
    • Generation Asia Research Reports
    • Asia Taskforce
    • CEO Roundtables
    • Viet Nam Initiative
    • Australia and Korea: Middle Power Parallels
    • Australia-Japan: Stepping up a Special Strategic Relationship in Asia
  • Experts
    • Asia Society Policy Institute in Australia
    • Distinguished Fellowships
    • Scholar-In-Residence
    • Media Enquiries
  • News
  • Members and Partners
    • Become a Member
    • Our Members
    • Our Partners
  • Support Us
    • Support Asia Society Australia
    • Donate now
    • Planned giving
  • About
    • About Asia Society Australia
    • Our Strategic Plan
    • Our Programs
    • Our People
    • Our Board and Advisory Council
    • For the Media
    • Careers and Internships
    • Contact Us
Australia
Search
Australia
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Past Events
    • Global Live Webcasts
    • Program Streams
  • Issues
    • Complex Asia
    • Trade Smarter
    • Living with China
    • Generation Asia
  • Analysis
    • Australian Election Policy Briefs 2022
    • Briefing MONTHLY
    • China Executive Briefing
    • Disruptive Asia
    • Southeast Asia and COVID-19 Project
    • Webcast Videos
    • Explainers
    • Looking Ahead
  • Initiatives
    • Generation Asia Research Reports
    • Asia Taskforce
    • CEO Roundtables
    • Viet Nam Initiative
    • Australia and Korea: Middle Power Parallels
    • Australia-Japan: Stepping up a Special Strategic Relationship in Asia
  • Experts
    • Asia Society Policy Institute in Australia
    • Distinguished Fellowships
    • Scholar-In-Residence
    • Media Enquiries
  • News
  • Members and Partners
    • Become a Member
    • Our Members
    • Our Partners
  • Support Us
    • Support Asia Society Australia
    • Donate now
    • Planned giving
  • About
    • About Asia Society Australia
    • Our Strategic Plan
    • Our Programs
    • Our People
    • Our Board and Advisory Council
    • For the Media
    • Careers and Internships
    • Contact Us

How Australia can Help Keep Taiwan Safe

by Richard Maude, Executive Director, Policy, Asia Society Australia

Maude - Changing of the guards Taipei - See-ming Lee - Flickr
See-ming Lee - Flickr
March 29th, 2022

In a speech in Taipei on 4 March, former US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo argued that the United States should immediately offer Taiwan “diplomatic recognition as a free and sovereign country”.

The headline Pompeo created faded fast enough, overshadowed by the crisis in Ukraine. But Pompeo’s argument for a dramatic rewriting of America’s bottom line on Taiwan policy should have Australian decision makers on alert.

True, Pompeo’s position is not supported by mainstream Republican foreign policy thinkers (not that the Trump Administration had much truck with these). Nor was it backed by Pompeo in office.

Any future Republican Administration would probably stop short of such a dangerous step, especially if Taiwan opposed it. But it is a sign nonetheless of the direction in which China policy is moving. Others in the Republican Party want the US to end its policy of “strategic ambiguity” on the defence of Taiwan.

Pompeo is testing the waters for a possible tilt at the Republican nomination for the presidency in 2024. The fact that he is advocating upending the status quo reflects his view that a radical new Taiwan policy will be popular with the Republican base.

China policy has become a powerful weapon in the fractured, hyper-partisan US polity. America’s capacity for foreign policy over-reach in such a febrile environment should not be under-estimated.

The ultimate significance of Pompeo’s call will be measured not by how quickly the headline faded, but by how much he will now shape the debate on Taiwan within the Republican Party. Congressional mid-term elections loom at the end of the year and campaigning for the Party presidential nomination will accelerate in 2023. Pompeo has set the bar.

The former US National Intelligence Officer for East Asia, Paul Heer, observes that, seen from Beijing, the US-Taiwan relationship has been moving gradually towards one of strategic alignment at China’s expense, especially over the life of the Trump Administration. Heer notes that “Beijing may well lash out if it ultimately concludes that its prior understandings with Washington on the Taiwan issue are no longer operative.”

None of this would in any way justify the use of force to subjugate a free people. But the security dilemma here is textbook. A more aggressive and nationalist China under Xi Jinping sees unification as an essential component of China’s “national rejuvenation.” Taiwan’s people have never been less interested in, or attracted to, being ruled from Beijing. Taiwan’s close partners resolutely oppose any resolution of the Taiwan issue by force, are rightly determined to defend a flourishing Asian democracy, and want to expand their engagement with Taipei.

There is no easy way out of this dilemma. Taiwan’s distinct political identity can’t be denied, and we can’t know if China will tolerate separation indefinitely. Still, one thing is clear: kicking away the last formal diplomatic props under an already unstable status quo won’t make Taiwan’s people safer or its democracy more secure.

The potential costs and risks of a full-blown military intervention in Taiwan for President Xi Jinping and the Communist Party are enormous, as Putin’s faltering invasion of Ukraine demonstrates.

Such a move is not imminent. But China’s calculation could still shift later in this decade or beyond as the balance of power in the region – or Xi’s perception of it – shifts in Beijing’s favour.

China has many options beyond an attempt at invasion, including ramped up economic sanctions or trade suspensions, covert operations and co-option, occupying small Taiwanese controlled islands in the seas nearby, cyber-attacks on critical infrastructure or even blockades of Taiwan’s ports and attempts to close air space for commercial aircraft.

In short, Taiwan policy still needs calibration and America still needs some boundaries around its relationship with Taipei. This is a hard message to sell given the mood on China.

In the meantime, what Taiwan needs is more deterrence, especially asymmetrical capabilities. Taiwan needs more missiles, drones and sea mines. Lots of them. Taiwan can also build deterrence by demonstrating its will to fight as a nation, not just as an army. This could include, as Lee Hsi-Min and Michael Hunzeker have argued, a new volunteer civilian territorial defence force.

Deterrence can be built in other ways. The United States does not need formally to depart from its policy of strategic ambiguity to convince Beijing of its will to respond to military action against Taiwan.

Australia can help by working with others to demonstrate that maintaining the peaceful, democratic system in Taiwan is a global concern. The consequences of any attempt at forced unification must be clear to Beijing – permanently adversarial relations with West, the consolidation of a coalition determined to check China’s power in the Indo-Pacific, and massive, coordinated economic punishment.

The Biden Administration has told both Beijing and Taipei that it does not support independence. The temptation for policy makers in Australia will be to think about the approaches of a possible future Republican Administration when and if that moment arises. There is a risk that will be too late.

Australia regularly meets the Republican leadership in Congress and our diplomats in Washington will quietly engage the camps of Republican presidential candidate frontrunners as they become clear. Australia must be clear and firm in these engagements that it won’t support shifts in US policy that sound attractive but will in the end make Taiwan less secure.


Richard Maude is the Executive Director, Policy, Asia Society Australia and a Senior Fellow at the Asia Society Policy Institute.

A version of this article appeared in The Australian Financial Review on 29 March 2022.


Asia Society Australia acknowledges the support of the Victorian Government.

Victoria State Government

More Analysis

  • Ivanov - Hong Kong - Igor Son - Unsplash
    series

    Election Policy Brief | Australia’s Future in a Shared Region

    Asia Society Australia’s view on the foreign policy outlook ahead of the 2022 Australian election.
  • In the Media - North Korea - NBC News
    series

    In the Media | May 2022

    Asia Society Australia experts appears in NBC News, South China Morning Post, Foreign Policy, ABC Newsradio, The Australian, The Strategist and Viet Bao.
  • Suckling - Solar gift - Kate Ausburn - Flickr
    series

    Election Policy Brief | Climate Change and Clean Energy

    Are the major parties' climate policy proposals enough to arrest man-made climate change, and what should they be doing?
  • Boekenstein - US Marines in Darwin - US Department of Defence - Flickr
    series

    Election Policy Brief | Defending Australia

    What are the major parties planning for Defence in this election, and what are the best policy strategies for national security?
  • Fraser - Myanmar police - R Bociaga - Shutterstock
    series

    Election Policy Brief | Human Rights

    What are the major parties promising to do to support human rights across the region, and what must they do?
  • Byrne - ASEAN Day festivities - Miraclebuggy - AdobeStock
    series

    Election Policy Brief | Engaging Southeast Asia

    How are the major parties looking to engage with Southeast Asia?

Pagination

  • Current page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Page 4
  • Page 5
  • Page 6
  • Page 7
  • Page 8
  • Page 9
  • Next page Next
  • Last page Last
About
  • Mission & History
  • Our People
  • Become a Member
  • Career Opportunities
  • Corporate Involvement
visit us
  • Hong Kong
  • New York
  • Texas
global network
  • Australia
  • France
  • India
  • Japan
  • Korea
  • Northern California
  • Philippines
  • Southern California
  • Switzerland
  • Washington, DC
resources
  • Arts
  • Asia Society Magazine
  • ChinaFile
  • Current Affairs
  • Education
  • For Kids
  • Policy
  • Video
shop
  • AsiaStore
initiatives
  • Arts & Museum Summit
  • Asia 21 Young Leaders
  • Asia Arts Game Changer Awards
  • Asia Game Changer Awards
  • Asia Society Museum: The Asia Arts & Museum Network
  • Asia Society Policy Institute
  • Asian Women Empowered
  • Center for Global Education
  • Center on U.S.-China Relations
  • China Learning Initiatives
  • Coal + Ice
  • Creative Voices of Muslim Asia
  • Global Cities Education Network
  • Global Talent Initiatives
  • U.S.-Asia Entertainment Summit
  • U.S.-China Dialogue
  • U.S.-China Museum Summit
Connect
Email Signup For the media
Asia Society logo
©2022 Asia Society | Privacy Statement | Accessibility | Terms & Conditions | Sitemap | Contact

Asia Society takes no institutional position on policy issues and has no affiliation with any government.
The views expressed by Asia Society staff, fellows, experts, report authors, program speakers, board members, and other affiliates are solely their own. Learn more.

 

 

  • Visit Us
  • Hong Kong
  • New York
  • Texas
  • Global Network
  • Australia
  • France
  • India
  • Japan
  • Korea
  • Northern California
  • Philippines
  • Southern California
  • Switzerland
  • Washington, DC