Kyrgyzstan Vote Tilts Toward Nationalists - What It Means
“That you can hold an election and not know ahead of time who will win by a crushing margin is a real achievement of Kyrgyzstan, which has defied centuries of Central Asian despotism to do just that. Yet, the surprising results of Sunday’s parliamentary ballot give cause for concern about the future of this fractured nation, which in the past five years has endured two revolutions and a bloody inter-ethnic conflict,” says Asia Society Bernard Schwartz Fellow Philip Shishkin.
“For Washington, this matters because the leader of the nationalist party that won the largest share of seats in the new parliament wants to expel the American military base, a key logistical hub for the Afghanistan war. In pre-election comments, the same nationalist leader made it clear that he doesn’t support greater rights for Kyrgyzstan’s ethnic minorities, a dangerous stance to take in the immediate aftermath of a summer massacre in which hundreds died, most of them ethnic Uzbeks. But in a truly Western European-style outcome, no single party garnered enough seats to rule on its own, so it will take some time for a new government to take shape. Extreme positions may well be tempered during coalition talks. Whatever the outcome, it appears likely that Kyrgyzstan’s new leadership will be more nationalist at home and pro-Russian abroad.”
Philip is based in Washington. To arrange an interview, contact the Asia Society communications department at 212-327-9271 or email@example.com.