U.S.-China Trade Deal ‘Meaningful’ But ‘Falls Way Short’ of Original U.S. Objectives, Says ASPI Expert | Asia Society Skip to main content
  • Arts
    • Asia Society Museum
      • Visit
      • Exhibitions
      • Programs
      • Learn
      • Support
    • Arts & Museum Summit
    • Asia Arts Game Changer Awards
      • About
      • Honorees
      • Ceremonies
      • Photos
      • Support
    • Creative Voices of Muslim Asia
      • Resources
      • Exhibitions
      • Videos
    • Film
    • Literature
    • Performing Arts
  • Education
    • Center for Global Education
      • Professional Development
      • Educator Resources
      • Our Ideas
      • Asia Society at Home
      • Education For Equity
      • About
  • Policy
    • Asia Society Policy Institute
      • Topics
      • Regions
      • Events
      • About
      • Support Us
    • Center on U.S.-China Relations
      • Home
      • About
      • Projects
      • Reports
      • Past Events
      • ChinaFile
  • Initiatives
    • Arts
      • Arts & Museum Summit
      • Asia Arts Game Changer Awards
      • Asia Society Museum: The Asia Arts & Museum Network
      • Creative Voices of Muslim Asia
      • U.S.-China Museum Summit
      • U.S.-Asia Entertainment Summit
    • Education
      • Center for Global Education
      • China Learning Initiatives
      • Global Cities Education Network
      • Global Learning Beyond School
      • International Studies Schools Network
    • Leadership
      • Asia Game Changer Awards
      • Asia 21 Young Leaders Initiative
      • Global Talent Initiatives
      • U.S.-China Dialogue
    • Policy
      • Asia Society Policy Institute
      • Center on U.S.-China Relations
    • Sustainability
      • Coal + ICe
  • Countries & Regions
    • Column One
      • Afghanistan

      • American Samoa

      • Armenia
      • Australia
      • Azerbaijan
      • Bahrain
      • Bangladesh

      • Bhutan

      • Brunei

      • Cambodia

      • Central Asia
      • China
      • Cook Islands

      • Cyprus
      • East Asia
      • East Timor
      • Fiji

      • French Polynesia

      • Georgia

      • Guam
    • Column Two
      • Hong Kong
      • India
      • Indonesia
      • Iran
      • Iraq
      • Israel
      • Japan
      • Jordan
      • Kazakhstan
      • Kiribati
      • Kuwait

      • Kyrgyzstan
      • Laos
      • Lebanon
      • Macau
      • Malaysia
      • Maldives
      • Marshall Islands
      • Micronesia

      • Mongolia

    • Column Three
      • Myanmar

      • Nauru

      • Nepal

      • New Caledonia

      • New Zealand

      • Niue
      • North Korea

      • Northern Marianas
      • Oceania
      • Oman

      • Pakistan

      • Palau
      • Palestine

      • Papua New Guinea
      • Philippines
      • Qatar

      • Samoa
      • Saudi Arabia
      • Singapore

      • Solomon Islands

    • Column Four
      • South Asia
      • Southeast Asia
      • South Korea
      • Sri Lanka
      • Syria
      • Taiwan
      • Tajikistan
      • Thailand
      • Tibet
      • Tokelau
      • Tonga
      • Turkey

      • Turkmenistan

      • Tuvalu
      • United Arab Emirates
      • Uzbekistan
      • Vanuatu
      • Vietnam
      • Wallis and Futuna
      • West Asia
      • Yemen
  • Current Affairs
    • Topics
      • Business
      • Environment
      • Governance
    • Programming
      • Beyond the Headlines
      • Business of Asia
    • Center on U.S.-China Relations
      • Home
      • About
      • Projects
      • Reports
      • Past Events
      • ChinaFile
  • Look & Listen
    • Asia Blog
    • ChinaFile
    • Podcasts
    • Video Gallery
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Past Events
  • Visit
    • Visit Us
      • Hong Kong
      • New York
      • Texas
    • Global Network
      • Australia
      • India
      • Japan
      • Korea
      • Northern California
      • Philippines
      • Southern California
      • Switzerland
      • Washington, DC
  • About
    • About Asia Society
    • Inclusion & Diversity
    • Mission & History
    • Co-Chairs and Trustees
    • Senior Leadership
    • Global Staff
    • Experts & Fellows
    • Global Council
    • Careers
    • Interns and Volunteers
    • Financial Statements
    • For the Media
      • Press Releases
  • Support
    • The Campaign for Asia Society
    • Corporate Engagement
      • Business Council
      • Global Talent and Diversity Council
      • Rising Executives Network
      • Enhancements to Membership
      • Corporate Membership
      • Global Corporate Leaders
    • Membership
    • Donate
ASIABLOG
Search
Search
  • Arts
    • Asia Society Museum
      • Visit
      • Exhibitions
      • Programs
      • Learn
      • Support
    • Arts & Museum Summit
    • Asia Arts Game Changer Awards
      • About
      • Honorees
      • Ceremonies
      • Photos
      • Support
    • Creative Voices of Muslim Asia
      • Resources
      • Exhibitions
      • Videos
    • Film
    • Literature
    • Performing Arts
  • Education
    • Center for Global Education
      • Professional Development
      • Educator Resources
      • Our Ideas
      • Asia Society at Home
      • Education For Equity
      • About
  • Policy
    • Asia Society Policy Institute
      • Topics
      • Regions
      • Events
      • About
      • Support Us
    • Center on U.S.-China Relations
      • Home
      • About
      • Projects
      • Reports
      • Past Events
      • ChinaFile
  • Initiatives
    • Arts
      • Arts & Museum Summit
      • Asia Arts Game Changer Awards
      • Asia Society Museum: The Asia Arts & Museum Network
      • Creative Voices of Muslim Asia
      • U.S.-China Museum Summit
      • U.S.-Asia Entertainment Summit
    • Education
      • Center for Global Education
      • China Learning Initiatives
      • Global Cities Education Network
      • Global Learning Beyond School
      • International Studies Schools Network
    • Leadership
      • Asia Game Changer Awards
      • Asia 21 Young Leaders Initiative
      • Global Talent Initiatives
      • U.S.-China Dialogue
    • Policy
      • Asia Society Policy Institute
      • Center on U.S.-China Relations
    • Sustainability
      • Coal + ICe
  • Countries & Regions
    • Column One
      • Afghanistan

      • American Samoa

      • Armenia
      • Australia
      • Azerbaijan
      • Bahrain
      • Bangladesh

      • Bhutan

      • Brunei

      • Cambodia

      • Central Asia
      • China
      • Cook Islands

      • Cyprus
      • East Asia
      • East Timor
      • Fiji

      • French Polynesia

      • Georgia

      • Guam
    • Column Two
      • Hong Kong
      • India
      • Indonesia
      • Iran
      • Iraq
      • Israel
      • Japan
      • Jordan
      • Kazakhstan
      • Kiribati
      • Kuwait

      • Kyrgyzstan
      • Laos
      • Lebanon
      • Macau
      • Malaysia
      • Maldives
      • Marshall Islands
      • Micronesia

      • Mongolia

    • Column Three
      • Myanmar

      • Nauru

      • Nepal

      • New Caledonia

      • New Zealand

      • Niue
      • North Korea

      • Northern Marianas
      • Oceania
      • Oman

      • Pakistan

      • Palau
      • Palestine

      • Papua New Guinea
      • Philippines
      • Qatar

      • Samoa
      • Saudi Arabia
      • Singapore

      • Solomon Islands

    • Column Four
      • South Asia
      • Southeast Asia
      • South Korea
      • Sri Lanka
      • Syria
      • Taiwan
      • Tajikistan
      • Thailand
      • Tibet
      • Tokelau
      • Tonga
      • Turkey

      • Turkmenistan

      • Tuvalu
      • United Arab Emirates
      • Uzbekistan
      • Vanuatu
      • Vietnam
      • Wallis and Futuna
      • West Asia
      • Yemen
  • Current Affairs
    • Topics
      • Business
      • Environment
      • Governance
    • Programming
      • Beyond the Headlines
      • Business of Asia
    • Center on U.S.-China Relations
      • Home
      • About
      • Projects
      • Reports
      • Past Events
      • ChinaFile
  • Look & Listen
    • Asia Blog
    • ChinaFile
    • Podcasts
    • Video Gallery
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Past Events
  • Visit
    • Visit Us
      • Hong Kong
      • New York
      • Texas
    • Global Network
      • Australia
      • India
      • Japan
      • Korea
      • Northern California
      • Philippines
      • Southern California
      • Switzerland
      • Washington, DC
  • About
    • About Asia Society
    • Inclusion & Diversity
    • Mission & History
    • Co-Chairs and Trustees
    • Senior Leadership
    • Global Staff
    • Experts & Fellows
    • Global Council
    • Careers
    • Interns and Volunteers
    • Financial Statements
    • For the Media
      • Press Releases
  • Support
    • The Campaign for Asia Society
    • Corporate Engagement
      • Business Council
      • Global Talent and Diversity Council
      • Rising Executives Network
      • Enhancements to Membership
      • Corporate Membership
      • Global Corporate Leaders
    • Membership
    • Donate

U.S.-China Trade Deal ‘Meaningful’ But ‘Falls Way Short’ of Original U.S. Objectives, Says ASPI Expert

January 16th, 2020
Liu He and Donald Trump hold up signed agreements of phase one of the U.S.-China trade deal

President Donald Trump and Chinese Vice Premier Liu He, hold up signed agreements of phase 1 of a trade deal between the U.S. and China, in the East Room at the White House, on January 15, 2020, in Washington, DC. (Mark Wilson/Getty Images)

U.S. President Donald Trump signed the first phase of a new trade deal with China on Wednesday, calling the agreement “a momentous step toward a future of fair and reciprocal trade” and one that “rights the wrong of the past.” China’s chief trade negotiator, Vice Premier Liu He, in turn, said the deal was “conducive to world peace and prosperity.”

The New York Times has a useful summary of what’s in the deal and what still needs to be addressed in subsequent negotiations. They also provided the full document released by the Trump administration.

Here’s how experts from the Asia Society Policy Institute (ASPI) reacted to Wednesday’s signing:


ASPI Vice President Wendy Cutler, a longtime diplomat and negotiator in the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative:

The U.S.-China phase one trade deal is meaningful with substantive provisions, yet falls way short of the ambitious objectives that the Trump administration set out at the start of the talks. This is not surprising. China is a formidable negotiating partner, the expected negotiating leverage from tariffs didn’t fully materialize, and U.S. interests were increasingly hurt by the tariffs.  

The deal will de-escalate tensions between the U.S. and China, while averting the scheduled tariff increases and rolling back some tariffs. The chapters on intellectual property rights and agriculture non-tariff measures are the most detailed, addressing many long-standing bilateral concerns. The technology transfer language is a good first step, but quite vague. The absence of disciplines on subsidies and the operation of state-owned enterprises is disappointing, particularly given the administration’s emphasis on tackling these matters. The purchasing commitments raise WTO concerns and smack of a managed trade approach. 

There are three key differences between this agreement and previous U.S. deals with China. First, the phase one deal includes extensive Chinese purchasing commitments of U.S. goods and services. Second, a substantial amount of U.S. tariffs will remain in place, continuing to apply to about two-thirds of Chinese imports. Third, the agreement features a dispute resolution mechanism, providing for the re-imposition of tariffs should consultations fail to head off violations. 

While the phase two talks will be launched in the near future, the likelihood of any rapid conclusion is remote. This is because the more difficult matters, including subsidies, the behavior of state-owned enterprises, and cyber concerns have been put off to this phase. Not only do they not lend themselves to quick fixes, they are at the heart of China’s economic model, making sweeping and timely Chinese concessions unlikely. 

Washington and Beijing will each have incentives to ensure that implementation of the phase one agreement goes smoothly. Beijing will be loath to subject its exports to further tariff increases. Washington will want to show that this deal can stick, particularly during an election year. Thus, we can expect both sides to work hard through the mandated 90-day consultation period to address violations. Of course, depending on the nature and impact of a potential problem, and how the politics shake out, it can’t be ruled out that the U.S. would re-impose tariffs.   

Third countries will be most concerned about the massive purchasing commitments, particularly whether these procurements take place at their expense and fall afoul of WTO rules. That said, other countries should welcome the de-escalation of trade tensions between Washington and Beijing and those provisions which will be applied on a most-favored nation basis. 


ASPI President Kevin Rudd, in attendance at the White House for Wednesday's event, on the CNN program Quest Means Business:

“I would give [the deal] a reasonable mark: five or six out of 10. And that, in terms of where we were before, isn’t all that bad.”

Good to attend signing of Phase 1 US-China trade deal at the White House. I see it as 1) a 12 month ceasefire in trade war - good for global economy; 2) some progress on intellectual property protection; 3) hard stuff pushed into Phase 2) which is still a long way off, if ever. pic.twitter.com/P1KwKs7hQb

— Kevin Rudd (@MrKRudd) January 15, 2020

ASPI Vice President for International Security and Diplomacy Daniel Russel in The Washington Post:

“From the Chinese perspective, the time had come when Trump calculated it was politically expedient to cut his losses and close the deal. This convinced them their strategy of talk-talk, fight-fight, had been the right one, and that they were justified in not having made fundamental concessions since his political need to finally close a deal presented them with an opening.”

Today's deal with the Chinese proves 2 things:
1. Trade wars are not easy to win.
2. China isn't buying soybeans, it's buying time... time to see how U.S. elections pan out; time to gear up for the "struggle" ahead over tech, standards, and influence.

— Danny Russel (@dannyrrussel) January 15, 2020
asia blog
asia society policy institute
liu he
donald trump
u.s.-china trade war
kevin rudd
wendy cutler
daniel russel
trade
economics
about partners subscribe

About the Author

Profile picture for user Matt Schiavenza

Matt Schiavenza is the Assistant Director of Content at Asia Society. His work has appeared at The Atlantic, The Daily Beast, The New Republic, Fortune, and strategy + business among other publications.

Contents

  • Arts
  • Business
  • Current Affairs
  • Education
  • Food & Recipes
  • Lifestyle
  • Multimedia
  • Policy

Featured Posts

Suharto
Q&A: Vincent Bevins on How Indonesia’s Anti-Communist Campaign Shaped the Modern World
Doctors treat a patient infected with COVID-19
A Pulmonary Physician on What It's Like To Treat COVID-19 Patients
A scene from Never Have I Ever
'Never Have I Ever' Star Poorna Jagannathan on Saying No to Roles Portraying Indian Caricatures
Alan Yang Asian In-Depth
Asia In-Depth Podcast: A Conversation With Writer and Director Alan Yang
Facebook
We Know Asia,
Get to Know Us

Visit Us

  • Hong Kong
  • New York
  • Texas

Global Network

  • Australia
  • India
  • Japan
  • Korea
  • Northern California
  • Philippines
  • Southern California
  • Switzerland
  • Washington, DC

Resources

  • Arts
  • Asia Blog
  • ChinaFile
  • Current Affairs
  • Education
  • For Kids
  • Policy
  • Video

Shop

  • AsiaStore

Initiatives

  • Arts & Museum Summit
  • Asia 21 Young Leaders
  • Asia Arts Game Changer Awards
  • Asia Game Changer Awards
  • Asia Society Museum: The Asia Arts & Museum Network
  • Asia Society Policy Institute
  • Center for Global Education
  • Center on U.S.-China Relations
  • China Learning Initiatives
  • Coal + Ice
  • Creative Voices of Muslim Asia
  • Global Cities Education Network
  • Global Learning Beyond School
  • Global Talent Initiatives
  • Int'l Studies Schools Network
  • U.S.-Asia Entertainment Summit
  • U.S.-China Dialogue
  • U.S.-China Museum Summit

About Asia Society

  • Mission & History
  • Our People
  • Become a Member
  • Career Opportunities
  • Corporate Involvement

Connect

  • Email Signup
  • For the Media

©2021 Asia Society | Privacy Statement | Accessibility | About AsiaSociety.org | Terms & Conditions | Sitemap | Contact

Asia Society takes no institutional position on policy issues and has no affiliation with any government.
The views expressed by Asia Society staff, fellows, experts, report authors, program speakers, board members, and other affiliates are solely their own. Learn more.

 

 

  • Visit Us
  • Hong Kong
  • New York
  • Texas
  • Global Network
  • Australia
  • India
  • Japan
  • Korea
  • Northern California
  • Philippines
  • Southern California
  • Switzerland
  • Washington, DC