ASPI Note: Understanding the Biden-Xi Summit | Asia Society Skip to main content

Unsupported Browser Detected.
It seems the web browser you're using doesn't support some of the features of this site. For the best experience, we recommend using a modern browser that supports the features of this website. We recommend Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox, or Microsoft Edge

  • Back to asiasociety.org
  • Topics
    • Prosperity
    • Security
    • Sustainability
  • Countries & Regions
    • East Asia
    • Southeast Asia
    • South Asia
    • Central Asia
    • West Asia
  • Publications
    • All Publications
    • ASPI Notes
  • Initiatives
  • Watch & Listen
    • Video
    • Podcasts
  • Events
    • AsiaX
    • Past Events
  • About
    • Mission
    • How We Work
    • Institutional Independence
    • Staff
    • Fellows and Advisors
    • Network of Experts
    • Supporters
    • News
    • Contact
    • Careers
    • Schwartz Book Award
    • Join Our Email List
  • Support Us
Search
Asia Society Policy Institute
  • Topics
    • Prosperity
    • Security
    • Sustainability
  • Countries & Regions
    • East Asia
    • Southeast Asia
    • South Asia
    • Central Asia
    • West Asia
  • Publications
    • All Publications
    • ASPI Notes
  • Initiatives
  • Watch & Listen
    • Video
    • Podcasts
  • Events
    • AsiaX
    • Past Events
  • About
    • Mission
    • How We Work
    • Institutional Independence
    • Staff
    • Fellows and Advisors
    • Network of Experts
    • Supporters
    • News
    • Contact
    • Careers
    • Schwartz Book Award
    • Join Our Email List
  • Support Us

ASPI Note: Understanding the Biden-Xi Summit

Joe Biden and Xi Jinping virtual summit in the Roosevelt Room
(Mandel Ngan/AFP/Getty Images)

November 17th, 2021 by Nathan Levine | 21/02

What happened: Presidents Joe Biden and Xi Jinping met virtually for their first “face-to-face” meeting on Monday, November 15, speaking for more than three hours in an attempt to set a new direction for the U.S.-China relationship amid serious tensions and what Biden has described as “intense competition.”

The background: With most channels of communication eventually severed during the Trump years, the Biden administration’s previous attempts at a substantive dialogue with China ended in theatrical recriminations and frustration. This decision to engage at the very highest level reflected deep concern about risks in the relationship. Both Biden and Xi seem to share an interest in forestalling a crisis or blowup — especially while each faces domestic political challenges over the next year. This was the first “summit” meeting between the two countries since June 2019, when Trump and Xi met on the sidelines of the G20 in Osaka.

What they talked about: Both leaders opened with firm – if clarifying – positions on issues of concern, including Taiwan, human rights, and trade. But they were also able to discuss the possibility of greater alignment in areas of common interest, such as climate change, global health security, stabilizing energy prices, and global macroeconomic recovery.

The bottom line: The virtual summit did not aim for a substantive breakthrough. It instead accomplished an important objective: setting in train a process to manage intense competition and stabilize a relationship that had dangerously deteriorated over the last four years. The key outcome of the meeting was an agreement to begin establishing what both sides described as the “guardrails” necessary to keep the relationship from veering into crisis and the real possibility of unintended conflict.

The next step will be opening communication through diplomatic, military, and economic channels focused on critical issues of concern. That includes managing areas of significant disagreement, such as trade and nuclear stability, exploring new areas for cooperation, such as on non-proliferation, and taking forward their recent joint declaration on climate change.

Reading between the lines: The virtual meeting may have lowered the diplomatic temperature, but both leaders will need to stay engaged to keep the process moving. It won’t be easy — intense strategic competition will continue across the board and politics have made “dialogue” and “cooperation” with China dirty words in Washington. Biden administration officials are skittish about being painted as soft on China and are suspicious of Chinese intentions. Real progress will likely be modest, slow, and fragile. Don’t expect Biden to visit Beijing for the Winter Olympics in February.

What to watch: Certain areas appear ripe for closer alignment between the two sides, including:

  • Energy: Both sides placed importance on stabilizing energy supplies and prices. Expect a discussion between U.S. and Chinese energy officials on further coordination.
  • Trade: Tariffs never came up in the meeting, to the disappointment of U.S. business groups which had lobbied for their removal. Tellingly, however, top economic officials Janet Yellen and Liu He were present in the room during the summit, suggesting that further engagement on economic issues may soon be in the cards.
  • Nuclear: After the meeting, National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan confirmed that the two leaders agreed to carry forward conversations on “strategic stability.” China’s recent nuclear weapons buildup has become a key area of concern for the U.S. military.
  • Non-proliferation: The two leaders discussed “aligning interests” on negotiations to restore the nuclear deal with Iran at talks planned for November 29 in Vienna – though China has also talked up “aligning” its interests with Iran and Russia as well.

Interested in learning more about ASPI’s take on the Biden-Xi summit? Check out our video, featuring analysis by Kevin Rudd, Danny Russel, and Wendy Cutler.

Chess

ASPI Notes

ASPI experts on what you need to know about what's happening in the Asia-Pacific.
About
  • Mission & History
  • Our People
  • Become a Member
  • Career Opportunities
  • Corporate Involvement
visit us
  • Hong Kong
  • New York
  • Texas
global network
  • Australia
  • France
  • India
  • Japan
  • Korea
  • Northern California
  • Philippines
  • Southern California
  • Switzerland
  • Washington, DC
resources
  • Arts
  • Asia Society Magazine
  • ChinaFile
  • Current Affairs
  • Education
  • For Kids
  • Policy
  • Video
shop
  • AsiaStore
initiatives
  • Arts & Museum Summit
  • Asia 21 Young Leaders
  • Asia Arts Game Changer Awards
  • Asia Game Changer Awards
  • Asia Society Museum: The Asia Arts & Museum Network
  • Asia Society Policy Institute
  • Asian Women Empowered
  • Center for Global Education
  • Center on U.S.-China Relations
  • China Learning Initiatives
  • Coal + Ice
  • Creative Voices of Muslim Asia
  • Global Cities Education Network
  • Global Talent Initiatives
  • U.S.-Asia Entertainment Summit
  • U.S.-China Dialogue
  • U.S.-China Museum Summit
Connect
Email Signup For the media
Asia Society logo
©2022 Asia Society | Privacy Statement | Accessibility | Terms & Conditions | Sitemap | Contact

Asia Society takes no institutional position on policy issues and has no affiliation with any government.
The views expressed by Asia Society staff, fellows, experts, report authors, program speakers, board members, and other affiliates are solely their own. Learn more.

 

 

  • Visit Us
  • Hong Kong
  • New York
  • Texas
  • Global Network
  • Australia
  • France
  • India
  • Japan
  • Korea
  • Northern California
  • Philippines
  • Southern California
  • Switzerland
  • Washington, DC