America’s Trading Partners Are Having Plenty of Fun Without Us
New York Times Op-Ed
This is an excerpt from an op-ed that was originally published by The New York Times.
There is a new buzzword in trade circles these days: diversification.
“There has never been a better time to diversify,” a spokesman for Canada’s trade minister wrote in a tweet after the disastrous recent Group of 7 meeting.
South Korea became so frustrated as it renegotiated its six-year-old trade agreement with the United States in the spring that it became determined to turn elsewhere. South Korea’s trade minister started a “trade diversification” strategy soon after the agreement was announced.
Diversification is the polite way of saying that America’s friends and allies believe we have become an unreliable partner, and they are now looking elsewhere. From Ottawa to Brussels to Seoul, our trading partners are fed up with the Trump administration’s tariffs, and they have given up on trying to charm President Trump or persuade him that free trade is good. To reduce their economic dependence on the United States and their exposure to a potential global trade war, they are forging trade deals that leave us out of the picture altogether.
The ASPI vice president and veteran trade negotiator explains why a new issue paper she co-authored on U.S.-Korea trade is so timely.
Wendy Cutler and Kevin Doyle question if it is time to update China's status as a developing country in the WTO.
By escalating tensions over national security, the United States may be hurting its own position in trade talks.
Wendy Cutler writes that Tokyo will worry about U.S. right to veto pacts with nonmarket economies, such as China
Wendy Cutler, ASPI VP and Managing Director, and former U.S. trade negotiator, says there's an opportunity for Trump and Xi to meet on G20 sidelines to get things moving on a more constructive path.