Teacher Evaluation: An International Perspective | Asia Society Skip to main content

Unsupported Browser Detected.
It seems the web browser you're using doesn't support some of the features of this site. For the best experience, we recommend using a modern browser that supports the features of this website. We recommend Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox, or Microsoft Edge

  • Chinese Language Learning
    • Mandarin Jumpstart
    • National Chinese Language Conference
    • Teaching Resources Hub
    • Language Learning Supporters
  • Global Education
    • About Global Competence
    • Global Competency Resources
    • Teaching for Global Understanding
    • Thought Leadership
  • Discover Asia
  • About
    • About
    • Results and Opportunities
    • News and Events
Search
Education
  • Chinese Language Learning
    • Mandarin Jumpstart
    • National Chinese Language Conference
    • Teaching Resources Hub
    • Language Learning Supporters
  • Global Education
    • About Global Competence
    • Global Competency Resources
    • Teaching for Global Understanding
    • Thought Leadership
  • Discover Asia
  • About
    • About
    • Results and Opportunities
    • News and Events

Teacher Evaluation: An International Perspective

2013 International Summit on the Teaching Profession

Education officials at the 2013 International Summit on the Teaching Profession

How do we define teaching quality?  How should teachers be evaluated? And how should school systems make use of the evaluations? Vivien Stewart, senior advisor to Asia Society and the author of the Summit reports, shares some of the discourse from the 2013 International Summit on the Teaching Profession, held in the Netherlands, March 2013.

by Vivien Stewart

The third in a series of unique gatherings of ministers of education and teacher union leaders, the 2013 International Summit on the Teaching Profession brought together delegations from the top 25 countries on OECD's PISA assessment of student achievement as well as from several rapidly improving countries. The first two summits, held in the United States, developed a consensus that achieving a high-quality teaching profession is critical to education systems as they face the increasingly ambitious demands of the 21st century and that the highest performing countries are successful because they take a comprehensive approach to recruiting, preparing, supporting, and retaining talented teachers and school leaders. The Summits spurred action on these issues in many of the participating countries over the past two years. This year, the Summit, which was hosted by the Dutch Ministry of Education, OECD, and Education International (the global federation of teachers' unions), took on the thorny issue of teacher evaluation.

Download the full report.

Why evaluate teachers? Education systems around the world are setting ambitious goals for both high performance and high equity. This will require high-quality teaching for each and every student. OECD surveys have shown that the vast majority of teachers (83 percent) welcome informed feedback on their teaching as a way for them to improve their teaching and felt that the feedback they had received had been fair. However, in the countries surveyed, more than one in five teachers report never receiving any feedback from their principal or a senior teacher; others report that there is no recognition for superior performance; and in some places, 95 percent of teachers receive satisfactory ratings even where student achievement is weak. So teacher appraisal systems are seen as a potentially powerful engine for improving teaching and offering new roles for outstanding teachers. At the same time, the scale of public investment in education and the urgent need for improved student outcomes has led to increased demands for accountability. So propelled by the twin imperatives of improving teaching and strengthening accountability, teacher appraisal systems are the subject of increasing attention around the world.

Despite the often-contentious nature of discussions of teacher evaluation, there are, in fact, broad areas of agreement between governments and teachers organizations. Most countries do have teacher standards that define teaching quality. They also have appraisal systems although these vary enormously in design—ranging from informal conversations between principals and teachers in Finland, to peer review systems as in the Netherlands, to highly developed annual performance management systems like in Singapore. The definition of the role of the teacher, the education governance structure of the country, the existence of career ladders or not, and the styles of evaluation in other careers in the country all influence the design of teacher appraisal systems in different contexts, so there is no single universal approach. But there is general agreement that to be meaningful, appraisals have to be in the context of professional development since research shows that feedback on its own, without opportunities for coaching and practice of new skills, does not reliably lead to improvement. They also need to use multiple sources and measures of feedback (many countries include parent and student surveys as well as classroom observations, self, peer and principal assessment, and student test scores) to truly do justice to the complexity of the teacher's role. And they have to be designed in partnership with the teaching profession.

Teacher appraisal systems also require significant attention to implementation. It is critical that there is good training for the appraisers, whether principals, senior teachers, or external evaluators, so that the appraisals are clearly expert and credible. And doing serious appraisal requires time, as does the follow up professional development. How the assessment of individual teachers relates to the evaluation of schools and of broader education policies also needs careful thought since the conditions for effective teaching may vary a lot from school to school.

There are also areas of emphatic disagreement, including the weight given to narrow student test scores or value-added measures in teacher appraisals and the relationship of performance to rewards, especially bonuses or merit pay (as opposed to salary differentials that go with different career roles). It is also difficult to balance the goals of improvement and accountability. Poorly designed or top-down appraisal systems can unintentionally create a climate of fear and resistance among teachers and inhibit creativity.

The question facing most countries is not whether to have a teacher appraisal system but how to get it right. This is still work in progress. Despite strongly held views, there is little research as yet on what works or how expenditures on appraisal compare to other uses of funds to strengthen teacher quality. The Summit had serious, honest, and sometimes difficult conversations as leaders of governments and teachers organizations examined their differences and explored ways to resolve them. It did not provide definitive answers but experimentation around the world is helping to clarify the issues in this area and provide a broader set of options for countries to consider as they seek to provide a high-quality learning environment for every child.

Read the full report on the 2013 Summit and OECD's background report, "Teachers for the 21st Century. Using Evaluation to Improve Teaching." 

Other Articles About Professional Learning

  • A girl reads her book (andresrimaging /iStockPhoto)
    report

    Early Teacher Development

    New report highlights global best practices in recruiting and inducting new teachers into the teaching profession.
  • Education officials at the 2013 International Summit on the Teaching Profession
    report

    Teacher Evaluation: An International Perspective

    Teachers are nation builders. How do we know they are effective—and how can we support them?
  • A child sits in front of a chalkboard map of the world.
    Global Cities Education Network

    Advice from Asia: Invest in Teachers

    Asia Society gathered the education ministers from top education systems. Here's their advice.
  • American flag and globe
    Global Cities Education Network

    World's Education Leaders to Meet

    Teachers, ministers, and other education leaders to gather for summit on teaching profession.
  • A student smiles (maliketh/istockphoto)
    Global Cities Education Network

    How the World Recruits Teachers

    Recruiting great teachers is critically important. See how successful nations go about it.

Other Articles About Education Leadership

  • Future of Teaching and Learning 2019
    report

    The Future of Teaching and Learning

    Read the report from the 2019 International Summit on the Teaching Profession, which focused on the future of teaching and learning.
  • Cover of the 2018 International Summit of the Teaching Profession report
    report

    New Challenges and Opportunities Facing the Teaching Profession in Public Education

    Read the report from the 2018 International Summit on the Teaching Profession, which focused on new challenges and opportunities for educators in public education.
  • Edinburgh with the ISTP 2017 logo
    report

    Empowering and Enabling Teachers to Improve Equity and Outcomes for All

    The 2017 International Summit on the Teaching Profession focused on sustainable excellence and equity in learning.
  • 2016 International Summit on the Teaching Profession
    report

    Creating the Conditions to Achieve Quality Teaching for Excellent Learning Outcomes

    How can we create the conditions to achieve quality teaching for excellent and equitable learning outcomes? The 2016 International Summit on the Teaching Profession looked to answer this question.
  • GCEN CTE Working Group participants on a Shanghai school visit. (Asia Society)
    Global Cities Education Network

    Learning Across National Boundaries

    Amelia Peterson and Jal Mehta are investigating the learning experiences of participants in international learning communities, including Asia Society's Global Cities Education Network.

Attachment

  • teachingsummit2013.pdf (PDF, 1.71 MB)

Related Content

  • report

    The Future of Teaching and Learning

    Read the report from the 2019 International Summit on the Teaching Profession, which focused on the future of teaching and learning.
  • report

    New Challenges and Opportunities Facing the Teaching Profession in Public Education

    Read the report from the 2018 International Summit on the Teaching Profession, which focused on new challenges and opportunities for educators in public education.
  • report

    Empowering and Enabling Teachers to Improve Equity and Outcomes for All

    The 2017 International Summit on the Teaching Profession focused on sustainable excellence and equity in learning.
  • report

    Creating the Conditions to Achieve Quality Teaching for Excellent Learning Outcomes

    How can we create the conditions to achieve quality teaching for excellent and equitable learning outcomes? The 2016 International Summit on the Teaching Profession looked to answer this question.
  • report

    Implementing Highly Effective Teacher Policy and Practice

    How does education move from dialogue to action in the context of complex systems and multiple political, economic, and social imperatives? A new report offers recommendations.
  • series

    ISTP Teacher Testimonial

    A teacher testimonial from the International School of the Peninsula (ISTP) in Palo Alto, California.
  • series

    ISTP Student Testimonial

    A student testimonial from the International School of the Peninsula (ISTP) in Palo Alto, California.
  • report

    Excellence, Equity, and Inclusiveness: High Quality Teaching for All

    How can education systems achieve both excellence and equity? A new report offers recommendations.
  • report

    Teacher Evaluation: An International Perspective

    Teachers are nation builders. How do we know they are effective—and how can we support them?
  • report

    So Long, Knowledge Transmission

    Hello there, transference! A tech-tonic shift in educating for the global knowledge economy.
About
  • Mission & History
  • Our People
  • Become a Member
  • Career Opportunities
  • Corporate Involvement
visit us
  • Hong Kong
  • New York
  • Texas
global network
  • Australia
  • France
  • India
  • Japan
  • Korea
  • Northern California
  • Philippines
  • Southern California
  • Switzerland
  • Washington, D.C.
resources
  • Arts
  • Asia Society Magazine
  • ChinaFile
  • Current Affairs
  • Education
  • For Kids
  • Policy
  • Video
shop
  • AsiaStore
initiatives
  • Arts & Museum Summit
  • Asia 21 Next Generation Fellows
  • Asia Arts Game Changer Awards
  • Asia Game Changer Awards
  • Asia Society Museum: The Asia Arts & Museum Network
  • Asia Society Policy Institute
  • Asian Women Empowered
  • Center on U.S.-China Relations
  • Coal + Ice
  • Creative Voices of Muslim Asia
  • Global Cities Education Network
  • Global Talent Initiatives
  • U.S.-Asia Entertainment Summit
  • U.S.-China Dialogue
  • U.S.-China Museum Summit
Connect
Email Signup For the media
Asia Society logo
©2023 Asia Society | Privacy Statement | Accessibility | Terms & Conditions | Sitemap | Contact

Asia Society takes no institutional position on policy issues and has no affiliation with any government.
The views expressed by Asia Society staff, fellows, experts, report authors, program speakers, board members, and other affiliates are solely their own. Learn more.

 

 

  • Visit Us
  • Hong Kong
  • New York
  • Texas
  • Global Network
  • Australia
  • France
  • India
  • Japan
  • Korea
  • Northern California
  • Philippines
  • Southern California
  • Switzerland
  • Washington, DC