Student Assessment and Immersion Program Evaluation | Asia Society Skip to main content

Unsupported Browser Detected.
It seems the web browser you're using doesn't support some of the features of this site. For the best experience, we recommend using a modern browser that supports the features of this website. We recommend Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox, or Microsoft Edge

  • Chinese Language Learning
    • Mandarin Jumpstart
    • National Chinese Language Conference
    • Teaching Resources Hub
    • Language Learning Supporters
  • Global Education
    • About Global Competence
    • Global Competency Resources
    • Teaching for Global Understanding
    • Thought Leadership
  • Discover Asia
  • About
    • About
    • Results and Opportunities
    • News and Events
Search
Education
  • Chinese Language Learning
    • Mandarin Jumpstart
    • National Chinese Language Conference
    • Teaching Resources Hub
    • Language Learning Supporters
  • Global Education
    • About Global Competence
    • Global Competency Resources
    • Teaching for Global Understanding
    • Thought Leadership
  • Discover Asia
  • About
    • About
    • Results and Opportunities
    • News and Events

Student Assessment and Immersion Program Evaluation

A student looks at her teacher

By Ann Tollefson, with Michael Bacon, Kyle Ennis, Carl Falsgraf, and Nancy Rhodes

Student Assessment

Parents enroll their children in language immersion programs in order to give them the gift of knowing another language. They also expect that their children will do as well or better in learning the regular curriculum in the immersion language as will children who are learning that content in English. As a result, there are two fundamental strands of student assessment in elementary immersion programs: assessment of student learning in various subjects taught in the language, (e.g., math and reading); and assessment of the student’s proficiency in the immersion language. Both are used to evaluate individual student progress, to report to parents and the general community, and to support continual program improvement.

Assessment of General Content Learning

The often-repeated mantra of language immersion programs is “first, do no harm.” In other words, children’s grade-level and subject-area learning must not suffer because they are in an immersion program.

In most immersion programs, students take the same summative content-area assessments as children who don’t participate in an immersion program. Formative assessments throughout the year are generally in the immersion language although care is taken to assure that children have the necessary English vocabulary to do well on the district and state summative assessments they will take in English.

Assessments of Student Proficiency in the Immersion Language

Formative Assessments

Formative assessments are used to monitor day-to-day progress in the target language. They also serve as ongoing checks on the effectiveness of the program, informing planning and instruction. They can include:

  • Daily quizzes
  • Student projects
  • Observation checklists of “can do” statements
  • Integrated performance assessments
  • LinguaFolio self-evaluation

Summative Assessments

There are few summative assessments for children in grades K–6, which means that programs should try to develop a set of measures that will give a well-rounded picture of student proficiency in the immersion language.

In grades K–2, the only national summative assessments of second language acquisition are based on student interviews. These interviews provide rich language data from which to gauge interpersonal listening and speaking skills, as well as interpretive listening skills. For interview-based assessments, schools need to address issues of affordability, staff training, and time needed to assess students. Many K–2 programs use interview-based assessments in conjunction with other measures of student proficiency in the immersion language, including:

  • Assessments embedded within instructional units (Integrated Performance Assessments)
  • School and district assessments, ideally analyzed within professional learning communities of teachers
  • Observation matrixes or checklists of “can do” statements used on an ongoing basis by teachers to track students’ advancement
  • Quantitative measures, e.g., number of characters learned by students

For students in grades 3–6, STAMP 4Se is the only online assessment currently available. There are, however, several more assessment tests currently in development.

Since there is currently no single, easy way to assess the proficiency of students in elementary immersion programs, the best approach may be to gather data from several sources, using some data for student assessment and combining it with other data for program evaluation and reporting.

When designing an assessment plan for your students and an evaluation plan for your program, consider the following questions:

  • What is your budget for individual student and program assessment?
  • What skills are particularly important for your program in case you don’t have the budget to assess every child in every mode and skill? For example, if you had to choose, would you choose to assess listening and speaking or reading and writing? Or is interpersonal communication the most important goal for your program?
  • If your budget is limited, can you assess all students in a locally produced assessment (such as an observation checklist of “can do” statements)? Can you use your limited resources to assess a statistically significant number of students on a national assessment in order to pinpoint your program’s strengths and weaknesses?
  • How much time are you willing to devote to summative assessments?
  • Do you have access to technology that would make online assessment productive?
  • How soon do you need to see the results of the assessments?
  • What combination of assessments will give you the information you need and still allow you to stay within your budget? (There is no one right answer—you have many options.)

Sample Evaluation Scenarios

You have 250 children in your K–6 Chinese immersion program. Your assessment budget is $2,500, which gives you only $10 per student, well below what most national assessments cost.

Scenario One

You decide to design and use your own teacher-observation checklists for all children in the program. To broaden your program evaluation and provide outside verification of your internal ratings, you decide to assess the top 25 percent of your students on the STAMP 4Se. That will cost approximately $1,550 and it should give you a good idea of your program’s efficacy for students. You can then combine the two measurements into a matrix that you can use to evaluate and plan for the program’s improvement. Those results will also help you report to your community on the program’s progress. The remaining budget can be used to bring together teachers to analyze the results and plan for program improvement. Or you can increase the number of students you assess.

Scenario Two

You follow the same first steps as in Scenario One, but you decide to do a stratified random assessment on the STAMP 4Se of two low-level, two mid-range and two high-performing students from each grade level or class. Selecting students should be done carefully with clear criteria, such as English test scores.

Scenario Three

You decide that you want to develop your internal capacity to assess student proficiency, so you spend your limited resources on training your teachers in administering and using data from the SOPA to evaluate all students in your program. This training is available online. For example, you could train four teachers in designing, administering, and rating the SOPA for $300 each, totaling $1,200 for their joining the Moderated Introduction to SOPA course.

CAL offers an additional course, Rating the SOPA, for $500 per teacher, for additional intensive practice rating at the different proficiency levels. Through these training courses, your staff will have a better understanding of proficiency, which can be the basis for the in-house development of teacher-observation checklists (“can do” statements) for assessing interpretive and presentational skills, which are not assessed by the SOPA.

Scenario Four

As in Scenario Three, you decide to invite four teachers to train for administering and rating for the SOPA, but you reserve some funds to administer the STAMP 4Se to some of your students. With the remaining $1,300, you could assess approximately 65 students, which is slightly over 25 percent of the students in your program.

You Might Also Like

  •  Tokyu Plaza Omotesando Harajuku, Japan

    New Ways of Seeing: How Multilingualism Opens Our Eyes and Trains Our Minds for a Complex World

    In a new Asia Society publication, Chris Livaccari explores how multilingualism is a key aspect of life for most people in the world—and has been throughout history—and is a rich source of engagement, playfulness, and joy.
  • (Clipp2nd/Flickr)

    Why Language Immersion Works Well for Young Children

    Research shows that learning a second language as a young child provides lifelong benefits.
  • The Great Wall of China (stuckincustoms/Flickr)

    CELIN Briefs on Chinese Language Learning and Teaching

    There is a great need in Chinese language education for research-based information, examples of best practices, and useful resources for administrators, teachers, and parents. In response to that need, we developed this series of briefs.
  • Best educational practices are not-so-secret. (Tomwang112/iStockPhoto)
    Global Cities Education Network

    Learning from the "Shanghai Secret"

    Shanghai's “Four Traditionals” and “Eight Moderns” which the U.S. education system could adapt.
  • (powerofforever/istockphoto)

    Immersion Curriculum and Literacy

    What does it mean to be literate in Chinese, and what are the strategies to get there?
  • Key (Antagain/iStockPhoto)
    article

    Sprechen Sie Chinesisch?

    Teachers better understand student perspectives through this simple exercise.
  • A connected world graphic
    article

    National Imperative for Language Learning

    The best school systems in the world focus on language learning because they know it translates to future success in a global economy.
  • Your brain (Speaking in Tongues)
    article

    Your Brain on Languages

    What research tells us about the benefits of language learning.
  • A teacher in a classroom
    report

    How to Meet the High Demand for Chinese Teachers

    There's a short supply of Chinese teachers—and a very high demand. Read the recommendations on how to bridge the gap.
  • Growth in Chinese language programs
    report

    Chinese: An Expanding Field

    There's an estimated 200 percent growth in Chinese language programs in the United States in just four years. Read about other interesting trend data.

Pagination

  • Current page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Next page Next
  • Last page Last
About
  • Mission & History
  • Our People
  • Become a Member
  • Career Opportunities
  • Corporate Involvement
visit us
  • Hong Kong
  • New York
  • Texas
global network
  • Australia
  • France
  • India
  • Japan
  • Korea
  • Northern California
  • Philippines
  • Southern California
  • Switzerland
  • Washington, D.C.
resources
  • Arts
  • Asia Society Magazine
  • ChinaFile
  • Current Affairs
  • Education
  • For Kids
  • Policy
  • Video
shop
  • AsiaStore
initiatives
  • Arts & Museum Summit
  • Asia 21 Young Leaders
  • Asia Arts Game Changer Awards
  • Asia Game Changer Awards
  • Asia Society Museum: The Asia Arts & Museum Network
  • Asia Society Policy Institute
  • Asian Women Empowered
  • Center on U.S.-China Relations
  • Coal + Ice
  • Creative Voices of Muslim Asia
  • Global Cities Education Network
  • Global Talent Initiatives
  • U.S.-Asia Entertainment Summit
  • U.S.-China Dialogue
  • U.S.-China Museum Summit
Connect
Email Signup For the media
Asia Society logo
©2023 Asia Society | Privacy Statement | Accessibility | Terms & Conditions | Sitemap | Contact

Asia Society takes no institutional position on policy issues and has no affiliation with any government.
The views expressed by Asia Society staff, fellows, experts, report authors, program speakers, board members, and other affiliates are solely their own. Learn more.

 

 

  • Visit Us
  • Hong Kong
  • New York
  • Texas
  • Global Network
  • Australia
  • France
  • India
  • Japan
  • Korea
  • Northern California
  • Philippines
  • Southern California
  • Switzerland
  • Washington, DC