What the Philippines Election Means for the Contest in the Indo-Pacific | Asia Society Skip to main content

Unsupported Browser Detected.
It seems the web browser you're using doesn't support some of the features of this site. For the best experience, we recommend using a modern browser that supports the features of this website. We recommend Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox, or Microsoft Edge

  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Past Events
    • Global Live Webcasts
    • Program Streams
  • Issues
    • Complex Asia
    • Trade Smarter
    • Living with China
    • Generation Asia
  • Analysis
    • Australian Election Policy Briefs 2022
    • Briefing MONTHLY
    • China Executive Briefing
    • Disruptive Asia
    • Southeast Asia and COVID-19 Project
    • Webcast Videos
    • Explainers
    • Looking Ahead
  • Initiatives
    • Asia Trade and Innovation Hub
    • Supply Chains in Southeast Asia
    • Generation Asia Research Reports
    • Asia Taskforce
    • CEO Roundtables
    • Viet Nam Initiative
    • Australia and Korea: Middle Power Parallels
    • Australia-Japan: Stepping up a Special Strategic Relationship in Asia
  • Experts
    • Asia Society Policy Institute in Australia
    • Distinguished Fellowships
    • Scholar-In-Residence
    • Media Enquiries
  • News
  • Members and Partners
    • Become a Member
    • Our Members
    • Our Partners
  • Support Us
    • Support Asia Society Australia
    • Donate now
    • Planned giving
  • About
    • About Asia Society Australia
    • Our Strategic Plan
    • Our Programs
    • Our People
    • Our Board and Advisory Council
    • For the Media
    • Careers and Internships
    • Contact Us
Australia
Search
Australia
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Past Events
    • Global Live Webcasts
    • Program Streams
  • Issues
    • Complex Asia
    • Trade Smarter
    • Living with China
    • Generation Asia
  • Analysis
    • Australian Election Policy Briefs 2022
    • Briefing MONTHLY
    • China Executive Briefing
    • Disruptive Asia
    • Southeast Asia and COVID-19 Project
    • Webcast Videos
    • Explainers
    • Looking Ahead
  • Initiatives
    • Asia Trade and Innovation Hub
    • Supply Chains in Southeast Asia
    • Generation Asia Research Reports
    • Asia Taskforce
    • CEO Roundtables
    • Viet Nam Initiative
    • Australia and Korea: Middle Power Parallels
    • Australia-Japan: Stepping up a Special Strategic Relationship in Asia
  • Experts
    • Asia Society Policy Institute in Australia
    • Distinguished Fellowships
    • Scholar-In-Residence
    • Media Enquiries
  • News
  • Members and Partners
    • Become a Member
    • Our Members
    • Our Partners
  • Support Us
    • Support Asia Society Australia
    • Donate now
    • Planned giving
  • About
    • About Asia Society Australia
    • Our Strategic Plan
    • Our Programs
    • Our People
    • Our Board and Advisory Council
    • For the Media
    • Careers and Internships
    • Contact Us

What the Philippines Election Means for the Contest in the Indo-Pacific

by Dominique Fraser, Research Associate, Asia Society Policy Institute

flags on map

On Monday, May 9, the Philippines will elect a new president and vice president, who are chosen separately in a “first through the post, winner takes all” system. Two clear front runners have emerged with divergent views on how the Philippines should navigate a world with increased great power competition.

Ferdinand “Bongbong” Marcos Jr. is leading the most recent poll with 56%. He is the son and heir apparent of his late father, former dictator Ferdinand Marcos Sr., and his candidacy is seen as the final step in the rehabilitation of the Marcos family. His campaign, which has spread disinformation on social media aimed at the youth population, has centred on “unity” and his running mate for vice president is Sara Duterte-Carpio, daughter of the current president.

Maria Leonor “Leni” Robredo has garnered 23% in the poll. She is a former human rights lawyer and current vice president who has become one of the government’s staunchest critics. She is campaigning on a platform to increase trust in government, bolster the country’s healthcare system, and widen the social safety net.

Erratic foreign policy making under Duterte

Over his six-year term, current President Rodrigo Duterte has attempted to draw closer to China but encountered several obstacles. In his first six months in office, Duterte travelled to Beijing from where he returned with US$24 billion in promised loans and grants for his signature infrastructure program Build! Build! Build!. Since then, popular frustration has been growing over what is seen as a lack of results from these investment pledges.

Although the Philippines’ largest trading partner, China lags behind in terms of direct foreign investments; between 2019 and 2021, China’s foreign investments flows amounted to $496 million compared to Japan’s $1.6 billion, the EU’s $654 million, and the United States’ $607 million.

China remains the Philippines’ main external security threat due to its expansionist maritime claims in the South China Sea (what the Philippines call the West Philippine Sea). In 2016, the Permanent Court of Arbitration rejected China’s maritime claims vis-à-vis the Philippines, but newly elected President Duterte sidelined the ruling, calling it “just a piece of paper” that he would throw in the bin.

In recent years, China has become increasingly aggressive in the disputed waters. While generally content with Duterte, Filipinos want to assert their rights over disputed islands.

In 2020, Duterte announced the termination of the Visiting Forces Agreement (VFA) with the United States, from whom he had declared a “separation” in 2016. A year later, Duterte retracted the termination amid resistance from Senators and the military, as well as large COVID vaccine donations by the United States (22 million doses compared to China’s 5 million by the end of 2021).

Continuity or course change?

The next president will have some autonomy in making foreign policy and the two front runners have spelled out different visions.

Marcos is expected to continue Duterte’s pragmatic approach to China, although probably less erratically. He would keep a keen eye on any economic benefit to be drawn from China, having put pandemic recovery at the centre of his election campaign. Marcos has vowed to maintain the “special relationship” with the United States but “be friends with everyone”. China is likely to seek as close a relationship with Marcos as Xi Jinping enjoys with Duterte, which they have described as a personal friendship. Such an approach would leave China well-positioned to increase its influence in the Philippines over time.

Marcos has repeatedly said that the Philippines’ 2016 arbitral win against China could not be enforced and that a bilateral deal on the South China Sea was practical (this is China’s preferred option). But in February, he floated the idea of deploying navy ships or coast guard vessels in the disputed waters. This back and forth should not be read as Marcos’ abandoning his preferred approach to China but rather the imperative of being seen from time-to-time to respond to concerns in the Philippines defence establishment and popular opinion, which remains distrustful of China.

Robredo on the other hand has promised a course change. She has been critical of Duterte’s “reckless” China policy and has criticised his transactional approach to foreign policy. She has outlined an “inclusive and independent” foreign policy that favours no specific country and has mentioned the importance of traditional partners, including the United States, Australia, Japan, South Korea, and Europe. Robredo has said she would pursue deals with China but called the 2016 ruling “non-negotiable” and has pledged to build alliances and rally ASEAN in establishing the Code of Conduct for the South China Sea (in the making for over 20 years).

When Filipinos head to the polls next week, they will decide the future direction of the country’s contested foreign policy at a time when the whole region, traditionally intent on retaining autonomy, is increasingly under pressure to align with either China or the United States. Under a Marcos presidency, the country would likely draw closer to China, while a Robredo presidency would probably see strengthened ties with traditional allies, including some ASEAN members, the United States, and Australia.


Dominique Fraser is Research Associate for Asia Society Policy Institute in Australia.

MORE ANALYSIS

  • AB #49 - Rocco screenshot Solomons and China
    series

    Briefing MONTHLY #49 | April 2022

    A Pacific election? | Regional economic outlook | Singapore’s new PM | Asian student jobs | PNG business
  • A Closer Look Philippines
    video
     /  Switzerland

    Episode 7: A Closer Look at the Philippines

    In the seventh episode of "A Closer Look", we explore the Philippines. Mina Roces and Manuel L. Quezon III talk about the Filipino identity, gender roles, family dynasties, and the 2022 presidential elections.
  • The aircraft carrier USS Nimitz (CVN-68), the guided-missile cruiser USS Chosin (CG-65), the guided-missile destroyers USS Sampson (DDG-102) and USS Pinckney (DDG-91), and the guided-missile frigate USS Rentz (FFG-46) operate in formation in the South China Sea. The Nimitz Carrier Strike Group is conducting operations in the U.S. 7th Fleet area of responsibility.
    report
     /  Asia Society Policy Institute

    The South China Sea: Realities and Responses in Southeast Asia

    A compilation of essays that analyze the current state of the South China Sea dispute from five Southeast Asia-based contributors.
About
  • Mission & History
  • Our People
  • Become a Member
  • Career Opportunities
  • Corporate Involvement
visit us
  • Hong Kong
  • New York
  • Texas
global network
  • Australia
  • France
  • India
  • Japan
  • Korea
  • Northern California
  • Philippines
  • Southern California
  • Switzerland
  • Washington, D.C.
resources
  • Arts
  • Asia Society Magazine
  • ChinaFile
  • Current Affairs
  • Education
  • For Kids
  • Policy
  • Video
shop
  • AsiaStore
initiatives
  • Arts & Museum Summit
  • Asia 21 Young Leaders
  • Asia Arts Game Changer Awards
  • Asia Game Changer Awards
  • Asia Society Museum: The Asia Arts & Museum Network
  • Asia Society Policy Institute
  • Asian Women Empowered
  • Center on U.S.-China Relations
  • China Learning Initiatives
  • Coal + Ice
  • Creative Voices of Muslim Asia
  • Global Cities Education Network
  • Global Talent Initiatives
  • U.S.-Asia Entertainment Summit
  • U.S.-China Dialogue
  • U.S.-China Museum Summit
Connect
Email Signup For the media
Asia Society logo
©2023 Asia Society | Privacy Statement | Accessibility | Terms & Conditions | Sitemap | Contact

Asia Society takes no institutional position on policy issues and has no affiliation with any government.
The views expressed by Asia Society staff, fellows, experts, report authors, program speakers, board members, and other affiliates are solely their own. Learn more.

 

 

  • Visit Us
  • Hong Kong
  • New York
  • Texas
  • Global Network
  • Australia
  • France
  • India
  • Japan
  • Korea
  • Northern California
  • Philippines
  • Southern California
  • Switzerland
  • Washington, DC