Sri Lanka 'Needs Space' to Heal War Wounds

Dr. Gamini Lakshman Peiris fields a question about the centralization of power in Sri Lanka on Sept. 27, 2010. (5 min., 42 sec.)
(Photo: Elsa Ruiz/Asia Society)

NEW YORK, September 27, 2010 - One year after the end of Sri Lanka’s civil war, the Minister of External Affairs said a multifaceted approach to reconstruction is necessary to ensure a lasting peace.

Speaking with Executive Vice President Jamie Metzl at Asia Society's New York headquarters, Gamini Lakshman Peiris spoke of a need for openness as the country heals from decades of division. He was in New York to attend the annual meeting of the United Nations General Assembly. 

“We have nothing to hide,” said the foreign minister, who invited humanitarian organizations such as Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch to monitor the country's progress in rehabilitating Tamil fighters and the civilian minority populations.

Not all oversight has been welcomed, however. In June, Peiris said his office would deny visas to the three-person advisory panel appointed by UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon. The panel had been proposed to help advise the Sri Lankan Lessons Learned and Reconciliation Commission (LLRC) in investigating allegations of war crimes leveled against both sides of the civil war.

When Metzl asked why the foreign minister objected so strongly to the panel, Peiris replied that the panel was unnecessary. “We appointed a commission... [and] see no reason for a foreign body to be appointed at that time.”

Peiris also denied allegations of war crimes, which have been leveled by some humanitarian organizations, including the International Crisis Group. He argued that the use of anonymous sources detracted from the credibility of these charges.

“The vast majority of people who have come to testify [before the Sri Lankan LLRC]…have chosen to testify in public,” said Peiris, who questioned the motives of those who would not speak openly. “It is all as vague and as nebulous as you can imagine,” he said.

Peiris strongly objected to any criticism raised about the reconciliation process, saying that the work was only in its initial stages. He said the process would take time and that the results would be evident.

He added that through the democratic process, the Sri Lankan people would ultimately rule on the success of the commission.

He said, overall, the public supported the government but that the prevailing opinion was “if you don’t deliver, then we will throw you out. Use these powers to deliver, we expect you will, now get on with the job. That is the feeling in Sri Lanka.”

Reported by Mollie Kirk

Related Materials
Asia Society Resources on Sri Lanka
UN Coverage 2009: Sri Lanka's Challenges
The Fires Within: Sri Lanka at War

Click the link below to read C. A. Chandraprema's response to Jamie Metzl's interview with Mr. Peiris: http://www.island.lk/index.php?page_cat=article-details&page=article-details&code_title=9490
Wow, I just can't believe the rubbish here. I grew up in Sri Lanka between 1971 and 1985..was there during black July 83, teenager at the time. Have lived my whole life with this conflict and followed it closely. The truth is that any reconciliation will take a lot longer than 18 months - 10 years at least. All the attached articles here are written by the Tamil Tiger bloggers who spread total fabrications about what has been going on in Sri Lanka. They have no clue about what is currently happening at ground level. Obviously, I can understand that the losing side in any battle is going to be sour in defeat, but now the intensity of the Tamil assault via electronic media is becoming overbearing to any onlooker. The claims by Tamilnet, Transcurrents and all those others posted here in this forum - sighting some experts nobody has ever heard of (bah!), are all to be taken only with a pinch of salt. Most of the stuff about government atrocities, about resettlement, about this and about that, is all far fetched fabrications by the Tiger aliments in the Tamil Diasporas, sour and depressed at their loss – their Trans-national Bloggers Legion is highly busy. There are other dangerous enemies lurking about too. The kind the Singhalese would call anti- nationalistic. Traitors corrupted by a foreign hand. Yes, there is a whole industry of foreign Non Government Organisations (NGO) that were mostly set up 20 years ago under the past UNP government who are agitating for regime change in Sri Lanka, because they don’t want to spend millions on relocation and leave their cushy lives of 20 years in the Sri Lankan sunshine behind. Now that the war is over, most of these NGOs should be leaving the country. Also, huge economic development means Sri Lanka won’t need anymore hand outs in foreign aid, and the current progress in the country has scared the NGO brigade with the hyper development now predicted by all world economists, soon there will be no reason for them to be in Sri Lanka spending their un-audited charity funds donated from their own citizens tax monies. They are using their dollars to buy everyone they can corrupt and turn in to a device of their hoped regime change, not least the UNP members they themselves have corrupted over their 20 odd year tenures in Sri Lanka. They all profess reconciliation and show a humanitarian facade, but these Very Good Samaritans secretly agitate for the war to begin anew. It is said that “Satan always arrives disguised in a garb of truth”. The Tamil Diasporas and their Tiger elements within it were the main financiers of the Tamil Tiger war machine for over 25 years. They have been living in the west being spurred on by a dream of Eelam, a mythical country in the Northern and Eastern regions of Sri Lanka - where they were promised lands and status (very important in Tamil society) upon their return, but only if they showed their generosity towards the Tiger separatist war chest. The Diasporas want their promised never-land, so they want and hope and keep donating in the hope they can rekindle the lost war. They also know that they will never be able to start, let alone win, a war in Sri Lanka as long as the Rajapakse government is in power. Before any reconciliation with the Tamil diasporas is ever possible, the diasporas need to realize their delusions and understand that they were not funding any attainable cause, but a pipedream of a megalomaniac called Prabakaren. Eelam? Such a country has never existed and will never exist. At the end of a 30 year war it could be considered normal to have such unprincipled elements wanting to reignite the conflict, but as long as the current government of President Mahinda Rajapakse is in power there will be no way anybody will be able to reignite anything. People say Rajapakse is appointing his siblings to positions of power within the government, actually they contested and won their seats, and also, wouldn’t you appoint your brothers to the most key portfolios in government if you knew that all others just simply could not be trusted.
http://www.icj.org/dwn/database/flyer_panel_SLanka_final.pdf Human Rights in Sri Lanka, Major Challenges since May 2009, 15th session of UN Human Rights Council, 22 September 2009: ‘’The post-conflict phase in Sri Lanka is failing to meet minimal expectations on rule of law, democratic participation, investigation of and accountability for human rights violations, and ending impunity; not to mention social rehabilitation and political reconciliation after war.''
http://www.icj.org/dwn/database/BeyondLawfulConstraints-SLreport-Sept2010.pdf Beyond Lawful Constraints: Sri Lanka’s Mass Detention of LTTE Suspects, International Commission of Jurists, September 2010: ''This report addresses human rights concerns arising from what may be the largest mass administrative detention anywhere in the world. ….''
http://www.ecchr.de/sri-lanka.404.html Criminal Accountability in Sri Lanka, European Center for Constitutional and Human Rights, June 2010: ‘’Both the Sri Lankan government’s military strategy to fight the LTTE in northern Sri Lanka as well as the LTTE’s counterstrategy, constitutes not only a violation of international law and standards, but also amounts to criminal conduct. …. The few steps taken by the UN Secretary General as well as by UN Special Rapporteurs need to be supported to move towards an independent fact-finding commission. ….’’
Preventing aid agents(including the UN) from helping the Tamils devastated by years of aerial bombing and intense shelling followed by plundering by the army when journalists and foreigners have been banned from the region: http://transcurrents.com/tc/2010/03/no_funds_to_meet_needs_of_near.html/ No funds to meet needs of nearly 200,000 Northern IDPs due to govt refusal to endorse 2010 action plan, 13 March 2010: ''The funding crisis follows the government’s refusal to endorse the 2010 Common Humanitarian Action Plan (CHAP), authoritative sources said. …. The UN and other humanitarian agencies are running out of resources to meet the urgent needs of internally displaced persons in the North. ...'' http://www.reliefweb.int/rw/RWFiles2010.nsf/FilesByRWDocUnidFilename/SVAN-843LTD-full_report.pdf/$File/full_report.pdf Banking on Solutions, A real-time evaluation of UNHCR’s shelter grant programme for returning displaced people in Northern Sri Lanka, March 2010: ''....The extent of shelter destruction appears to have been underestimated .... government restrictions on NGO access limited programming options, .... Movement along the A9 is also still restricted for international NGOs and UN agencies. ...since July 2009 they(ICRC) have not had access to the 11,000 people suspected of LTTE links held in rehabilitation centres. ....’’
Tamils have equality? http://www.thesundayleader.lk/2010/09/19/next-the-19th-amendment/ Next, The 19th Amendment Tisaranee Gunasekara ‘’When Indian Foreign Secretary Nirupama Rao came visiting, the Tamil Parties Forum TPPF requested her to persuade the Rajapaksa administration to “engage the elected representatives of the Northern and Eastern Provinces in the resettlement and rehabilitation work” (Daily Mirror – 3.9.2010). This one incident suffices to illustrate the distressing state of Tamil politics in post-war Sri Lanka. When Lankan Tamil politicians have to ask a visiting Indian official to persuade the Lankan government to involve them in rehabilitating and resettling Lankan Tamils, it indicates a level of powerlessness and marginalisation totally inapposite with any genuine peace and nation-building effort.''
The Minister is lying about 'healing': Last week Chandra Jeyaratne has told the Commission what's happening to the detainees in camps and returnees in villages: http://www.groundviews.org/2010/09/23/submissions-before-lessons-learnt-reconciliation-committee-llrc-by-chandra-jayaratne/ Submission before Lessons Learnt & Reconciliation Committee (LLRC) by Chandra Jayaratne, 23 September 2010: • IDP’s being denied access to their former places of residence • Challenging the right to title of the properties traditionally owned and /or occupied persons living in conflict affected areas • Large tracts of previously occupied lands being demarcated as high security zones • Unjustified land acquisitions on security considerations but allocated for non security related purposes • The publicly announced resettlement benefits to internally displaced persons not being distributed equitably and in line with the announced scheme • Lack of basic amenities like water, sanitation, power and proper housing for the newly resettled families • Resource allocation not determined on community priorities and allocated without consultation and outside the need base and at times missing the most vulnerable and in need, possibly due to identity based biases • Some areas like Jaffna receiving more than necessary resource allocations and peripheral areas lacking in even basic allocations • Preventing willing and capable NGO’s/INGO’s, international community and Diaspora from helping people in need at their most vulnerable moment of need • Building of new permanent military cantonments with residential facilities for military personnel and their families • Plans to settle majority community families in order to change the traditional area demography otherwise than by natural development oriented migration • Arbitrary arrests and detention in the post war period as well • Continuing active engagement of unauthorized armed groups • Continuing disappearances of civilians • List of persons in custody, camps and detention centres not being made public • Failure to assist families in tracing missing persons • Negative impact on civilians during the conflict due military excesses • Unease of single women headed families fearing for their safety in the presence of large number of armed personnel of the forces • Removal of burial sites of persons affected by the conflict • Some important cultural, religious and remembrance sites being damaged and destroyed • Disrespect shown by visitors to holy sites and sites held in high esteem by resident communities • Free availability of liquor, cigarettes and narcotics • Emerging consumerism promoted by business houses who fail to participate in adding value to the civilian communities • Savings of the region being channelled to other areas whilst unmet needs of area community remain • Decision making in the hands of the military or officials from the Central Government
When he ignored the checks and balances in the Seventeenth Amendment, and appointed his own people in the National Human Rights Commission, their performance was such that they were demoted by the world body of National Human Rights Organisations tto obserever status in December 2007. Now with the Eighteenth Amendment the checks and balances of the Seventeenth Amendment are removed. What are we going to see now from a President who already holds four ministries and going to appoint Police Commission, Public Servic Commission, Bribery Commission, Human Rights Commission, Central Bank and Supreme Court. Perhaps a competition with the Burmese leader?
GL Peiris is a great orator and his natural ability of speaking was very useful at sidestepping some pertinent issues last evening at the Asia Society. I appreciate the moderator (Dr Metzl) respectful perseverance in asking poignant questions and pursuing certain topics which were never suitably answered by the foreign minister. Why not have an independent panel of experts with stellar credentials appointed by the U.N. be allowed to weigh in separately (or join) the Sri Lankan Lessons Learned and Reconciliation Commission? Political dynasties might be acceptable in Sri Lanka and abroad but why abolish term limits in Sri Lanka for the executive office. Minister Peiris refers to having an open dialogue and transparency with the citizens of Sri Lanka - well it is difficult for minorities scarred by the ravages of war to come forward if the government does not offer assurances of safety and security of those that step up to bat.

Post new comment

Your comments are welcome, please adhere to our guidelines

Be respectful. Personal attacks will not be tolerated; nor will profane, abusive or threatening posts.

Keep it short (150 words or less), Stay on topic.

Asia Society reserves the right to moderate all comments and remove or edit for guideline violations. Thank you.

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Type the characters you see in this picture. (verify using audio)
Type the characters you see in the picture above; if you can't read them, submit the form and a new image will be generated. Not case sensitive.