China Is Looking Forward to Trump’s Truancy at the East Asia Summit
Lindsey Ford and Vikram Singh in Foreign Policy
ASPI's Lindsey Ford and Vikram Singh from the Center for American Progress published an article in Foreign Policy on President Donald Trump's decision to skip the East Asia Summit meeting next month. This is an excerpt from the original article.
China’s 19th Communist Party Congress wrapped up in Beijing recently with the decision to weave President Xi Jinping’s name into the party’s constitution alongside Mao Zedong. Soon after, U.S. President Donald Trump congratulated Xi and then told a reporter, “Now some people may call him the king of China.” In between these moments, the White House confirmed that Trump would skip the annual East Asia Summit, a gathering of 18 Asia-Pacific leaders, to shave a day off of his upcoming, marathon first trip to Asia as president. This must seem like a terrific coronation gift for the new “king,” whose country will now be the dominant world power at the summit.
It should not be this way. The gathering comes at the very end of a long trip to Asia that features a robust agenda, designed to demonstrate Washington’s commitment to the region. The summit remains the only opportunity for the president of the United States to sit down and collectively engage his Asia-Pacific counterparts on the main political and security issues of the day. Former President Barack Obama missed it once — because the Republican Congress shut down the entire United States government. Trump will actually be in the Philippines, where the summit is being held, as it gets underway. Departing as it begins can only be viewed as a snub and will undermine whatever else the president may have achieved in the previous 11 days.
Kevin Rudd writes that President Trump’s Asia trip casts further doubts about America’s long-term standing and commitment in the region.
President Trump skipping the East Asia Summit is a mistake, write Lindsey Ford and Vikram Singh.
Kevin Rudd says the Asia-Pacific region badly needs a security forum that links all relevant players, to help prevent disagreements reaching a crisis point.
Kevin Rudd writes that a second Korean War has now become an increasing possibility.
NATO may not be the right model for the Middle East and Asia, but multilateralism is possible and necessary in both regions.