Top School Systems Announced

NEW YORK, December 7, 2010 — The United States boasts the best education system in the world. It attracts great numbers of international students, and is studied by researchers and educators the world over. 

The international school rankings released today tell another story: that America's rising generation is not as competitive in critical thinking and problem solving as students in other countries. Out of 65 school systems tested, the United States ranked, on average, 26th. This represents a drop from 15 just three years ago. The U.S. ranked 14th in reading, virtually the same ranking as the 2003 test, 17th in science, which is an improvement from 21st in 2006; and 25th in mathematics, the same ranking as 2006. The good news is that U.S. students, especially those with the lowest performance, have significantly improved in science since 2006.

embed code

The rankings also show that Asian school systems dominate the top of the charts. Eight out of the ten best performers are in Asia. They are: Shanghai, Hong Kong, Finland, Singapore, Korea, Japan, Canada, New Zealand, Taipei, and Australia. 

The international rankings, called PISA, do correlate academic achievement and economic returns. If education is indeed society's greatest investment, it's time to re-examine the formulas in hopes of greater returns.

The top-performing nations share common attributes. They are:

Rigorous standards and coherent curricula. The top-performing systems have established high academic standards and curriculum for a global economy. Teaching and learning are focused on thinking critically, connecting ideas, and innovation.

An agenda of equity as well as excellence. Highly ranked systems give a high-quality education to all students, not just priviledged few.

Best candidates recruited and trained as teachers and principals. Only the best academic achievers are selected into the education profession. And once there, regular professional development keep educators and administrators focused on common goals. Compensation and growth structures are clear.

Emphasis on math and science. Math and science education begins early in primary school, and are scaffolded for continuous learning.

Time and effort. Asian students have the equivalent of several more years of schooling than the typical American student.

The top-performing systems, as well as the school systems that have showed greatest improvement, have also demonstrated that successful reform need not take a long time. By applying the right levers at the right times, school systems throughout the world have raised student achievement.

Learn more by seeing features by country or by reform topic

Here's my opinion: USA might not have the high standards of education, but they absolutely teach in a proper method. I have live in America for the first ten years of my life, but then had to move to India. Here, in India, there might be very advanced levels of syllabus, but still, has a very bad way of teaching. The teachers here give corporal punishment (Physical) if you have made a mistake in an exam, homework, etc. The teachers in my school had grabbed my hair and pulled it very hard while shaking my had back and forth. The main point is, they make you do all of the memorizing work instead of learning. All of the students just mug up a lot of information before the day of an exam, and forget all of that information by the day after the exam. They just remember the info in the textbook instead of thinking out of the box and using your imagination. Most of the schools also don't give importance to extra-curricular also, making a child very dull. In my opinion, USA schools are an easier way to go through education except that you get the same result from going to Indian schools

I read the New York Times' and Time Magazine's articles on the PISA test of 2009, which stressed reading this time, and I have a question: Are archeologists reading the PISA test results since all of the remaining strongholds of the ancient world's complex hierglyphic writing systems participated in PISA (e.g. Taiwan, Hong Kong)? I think this year is a boon year for all of those archeologists and historians studying ancient social history of various ancient civilizations - they now got a very good report and record on the late period/last strongholds to help them out in their research and in getting around from the likes of George W. Bush who looted the Bagdad Museum in 2003 or Empreror Theodoris who burned the Great Library of Alexandria.
How can individual municipal school systems be fairly compared to entire nations? In the list of the "top ten best performing" school systems above, Two (Shanghai and Taipei) are cities and one other is a city-state (Singapore), while the remainder are all large nation-states. How can this be considered a valid comparison? Wouldn't it be necessary to compare say, New York or Mexico City to Shanghai and not the United States or Mexico. The methodology here seems non-sensical.
Shanghai is more populous than the other "large nation states." Anyway, this is a critical thinking test of 15 year olds. It's an indicator of how school systems do, not a comparison of the systems per se. At least that's my understanding.

Post new comment

Your comments are welcome, please adhere to our guidelines

Be respectful. Personal attacks will not be tolerated; nor will profane, abusive or threatening posts.

Keep it short (150 words or less), Stay on topic.

Asia Society reserves the right to moderate all comments and remove or edit for guideline violations. Thank you.

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Type the characters you see in this picture. (verify using audio)
Type the characters you see in the picture above; if you can't read them, submit the form and a new image will be generated. Not case sensitive.