A World of Gods and Spirits
Temple in Vietnam (vicguinda/Flickr)
A World of Gods and Spirits
Religious Vehicles of Dissent
One method of enforcing orthodoxy applied mostly to Buddhism. It
consisted of imposing bureaucratic control over the organization and
size of the Buddhist clergy through the supervision of doctrinal exams
and ordinations into the clergy; limiting the number of temples that
were built and the amount of land they were given; and manipulating the
distribution of cultic and scriptural materials that were channeled
through the court. Taoist priests, not being organized, were much less
amenable to this form of control. But the more the state tried to
enforce orthodoxy, the more it invited challenges from more traditional
quarters, challenges which could be open, taking the form of rebellion,
or merely implicit. The state's concern over the link between religion
and rebellion was far from fanciful. In times past, Buddhist monks and
Taoist priests had been known to lead movements of rebellion.
Monasteries were still being used as places of refuge by rebels against
the throne. This was one powerful reason behind the efforts to regulate
Buddhist monasteries in the 19th century. It was easy enough to limit
the number of ordained monks, and to defrock those who did not meet the
standards set by the officials. However, given the limited resources of
the traditional state, it was harder to prevent people from pursuing a
religious life in places where the state did not penetrate. Such was
the case of the southwestern frontier, a pioneer region through much of
the 19th century, a meeting ground for various ethnic, cultural and
religious groups, and thus a fertile place for heterodoxies to flourish.
For reasons that are not clear, Catholic missionaries were not
successful in attracting converts in the south before the colonial
period. Most of the Catholics who were in South Vietnam in the 1960s
were refugees from the north, or had become Catholics during the French
colonial period. The brand of heterodoxy that flourished in the south
in the 19th century was thus a product of Vietnamese popular religion,
a mixture of Buddhist, Taoist, Confucian and animist beliefs. What
distinguished this heterodoxy from the state religion was partly the
prominence of Buddhism and Taoism over Confucianism, and partly a
fundamentally different world-view. Confucianism was at base
optimistic; life was good, nature was kind. This view was a logical
outgrowth of the idea that the emperor's rule was benign and
beneficial. Vietnamese religious dissidents, on the contrary, held a
much more pessimistic view of life. Theirs was an apocalyptic vision of
history.
According to this interpretation, the cosmos evolved in series of
cycles. Each of these cycles included a phase of prosperity, decay and
ruin. At the end of each cycle, when ruin, disasters and wickedness had
taken over, there would be an apocalyptic event, a flood perhaps, or a
cosmic conflagration, or a huge typhoon. It would engulf the world and
cleanse it of evil. All wickedness would disappear, and only what was
good and virtuous would remain. The forces of the cosmos would
rearrange themselves in a new "creation of Heaven and establishment of
Earth" (tao thien lap dia), and a new era of peace, prosperity and
virtue would begin. It was believed that our present era, ruled over by
the historic Buddha Gautama, was about to end, and that it would be
replaced by the era of Maitreya, the Future Buddha.
Maitreya was a popular figure of worship throughout the history of
Vietnamese Buddhism. In the Temple of the Heavenly Mother in Hue stands
a huge statue of him. Until the 19th century, he embodied hope rather
than despair. He symbolized the aspirations of Vietnamese Buddhists for
salvation and rebirth in his Pure Land. Even though predictions of an
impending apocalypse had surfaced many times over the centuries, the
Maitreya ideal was not linked to the fear of apocalypse. In the 1850s,
however, a new religious movement was founded on the claim that the
apocalypse was about to come, and that all wickedness was to be
destroyed. Then, the Buddha Maitreya would descend to usher in a new
millennium of peace and prosperity. The exact location of his descent
was to be a desolate hilly area near the Cambodian border in
southwestern Vietnam. Those who wished to strive for salvation and
rebirth in the reign of Maitreya were to gather there to cultivate
themselves and lead a good life. The new religious movement became
known as Buu Son Ky Huong or Strange Fragrance from the Precious
Mountain. The name of the movement was meant to refer to the fact that
Maitreya was expected to appear in the Seven Mountains of Chau Doc
province (hence the idea of a Precious Mountain) and that he would
preach a new Buddhist doctrine, likened by the believers to a strange
fragrance.
Southwestern Vietnam in the 1850s was pioneer territory with a sparse,
but mixed population. The Vietnamese there were in the minority against
both Cambodian natives and Chinese immigrants who had poured into the
area in a steady stream since the turn of the century. Among the
Vietnamese were people who had come in search of a better future. But
there were also many defrocked monks from other regions, as well as
people who were considered undesirable by the authorities of their
native places and had been sent into exile to this frontier. The
Vietnamese population in this region was thus adrift from its cultural
moorings, for traditional village structures had not yet acquired solid
foundations, and few representatives of the state were in evidence.
What the Buu Son Ky Huong movement had to offer to these pioneers,
dissidents and rebels was an ideology of moral, social and cultural
integration, an ideology that made sense of their hardship and of their
experiences, and provided them with hope for the future. This ideology
was presented as a return to the original purity and simplicity of
Buddhism. Observing the teachings of the Buddha in one's daily life
would be the only path to salvation, not the mindless utterance of
prayers, not costly offerings and elaborate ceremonies. It was thus a
reaction to the rigid monasticism of 19th century Buddhism. It was an
ideology that celebrated hard work and frugality, that did not
distinguish between rich and poor, that was family-oriented rather than
congregational or monastic. It was thus tailor-made for its pioneer
following.
Despite the sect members' self-image as orthodox Buddhists, their
leaders tended to be practitioners of popular religion --
faith-healers, soothsayers, and Taoist priests whose occupation gave
them power over the world of spirits and put them in contact with a
wide variety of people. Even the Buddhist monks among them did not
belong to mainstream Buddhism. The leaders spearheaded the creation of
new villages where the sectaries would be able to live according to the
beliefs and practices of their sect while waiting for Maitreya's
descent. They believed that all the hardships they suffered, battling
wild beasts and inclement nature and enduring the ravages of unrest and
periodic wars between Vietnam and Cambodia, prepared them for rebirth
into the perfect world of Maitreya. All else would perish. The myth of
the millennium was thus a powerful incentive to attract pioneers and to
give them the courage to remain in this inhospitable region. At the
same time, the religious teachings of the sect fostered a sense of
community that overcame the absence of long-standing village
institutions and kinship ties.
No more than the Catholics of the north did these unorthodox pioneers
openly challenge the authority of the emperor. They sought above all to
remain in the margin of mainstream society, free of official
interference. But even as they believed themselves to be loyal subjects
of the emperor, they put Maitreya -- and the prophets who claimed to be
the reincarnation of Maitreya -- above him. That in itself made them
vulnerable to suppression as heretics. But while the Catholics, linked
in the minds of the officials with the Westerners, came under
increasing persecution, the sectaries of the southwest were valuable
allies of the state as settlers of the disputed frontier area. The
state thus chose to leave them alone.
The sectaries became involved in the anticolonial movement soon after
French conquest. It was the first time that their apocalyptic vision
had led them into political militancy. In their calculations, the
apocalypse loomed nearer, and the need to use violence against the
established order as a prelude to the birth of the new millennium
became more urgent. Not surprisingly, the French banned the sect, but
were unable to eradicate it completely. Its roots were established
firmly among the population of the southwest, and were able to survive
into the 20th century.
One reason why the Buu Son Ky Huong sect was able to outlive repeated
persecution was its essentially family oriented nature. It had a
minimum of organizational structure. It was a way of life more than an
organized movement. Only when they rebelled did the sect members join
together, for congregational worship was rare. Partly because of this
characteristic, partly because of earlier suppression, the survival of
this millenarian tradition went largely unnoticed in the first few
decades of the 20th century, a time when secular political parties made
their first appearance in Vietnam. Of these the Communist party was the
most successful and visible, as well as the chief target of repression
by the colonial state.
Post new comment